Zenóbio EG, Zenóbio MA, Azevedo CD, Nogueira MDS, Almeida CD, Manzi FR. Assessment of image quality and exposure parameters of an intraoral portable X-rays device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20180329.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Drage N. Hand-held dental X-ray equipment–an update. Dental Update. 2017;2017:146–50.
Molteni R. The way we were (and how we got here): fifty years of technology changes in dental and maxillofacial radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50:20200133.
Amani T, Surenthar M, Tn U, Prethipa R, Kumar SL. Image Quality assessment of digital radiographs captured by hand-held devices versus wall-mounted devices: a retrospective comparative study. Cureus. 2024;16: e52900.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Berkhout WE, Suomalainen A, Brüllmann D, Jacobs R, Horner K, Stamatakis HC. Justification and good practice in using handheld portable dental X-ray device: a position paper prepared by the European academy of dentomaxillofacial radiology (EADMFR). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140343.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Dental Radiographic Examinations: Recommendations for Patient Selection and Limiting Radiation Exposure. 2019.
Ruiz DC, Fontenele RC, Gaêta-Araujo H, Farias-Gomes A, Oliveira ML, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F. Influence of a handheld X-ray unit in the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions using different digital systems. Oral Radiol. Published online January 21, 2025.
Ruiz DC, Fontenele RC, Farias-Gomes A, Oliveira ML, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F. Comparison of objective radiograph quality between radiographs obtained with wall-mounted and handheld X-ray devices. Imag Sci Dentist. 2024;54:22.
Oliveira-Santos N, Gaêta-Araujo H, Ruiz DC, Nascimento EHL, Cral WG, Oliveira-Santos C, Groppo FC. The impact of digital filters on the diagnosis of simulated root resorptions in digital radiographic systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:4743–52.
Brasil DM, Yamasaki MC, Santaella GM, Guido MCZ, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F. Influence of VistaScan image enhancement filters on diagnosis of simulated periapical lesions on intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20180146.
Braga MS, de Almeida Ramos AM, Coelho-Silva F, Bonadiman EA, Pereira TCR, de-Azevedo-Vaz SL. Impact of enhancement filters of a CMOS system on halo artifact expression at the bone-to-implant interface. Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28:161.
Haiter-Neto F, Casanova MS, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:116–21.
Belém MD, Ambrosano GM, Tabchoury CP, Ferreira-Santos RI, Haiter-Neto F. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27:245–51.
Gaêta-Araujo H, Nascimento EHL, Oliveira-Santos N, Queiroz PM, Oliveira ML, Freitas DQ, Oliveira-Santos C. Effect of digital enhancement on the radiographic assessment of vertical root fractures in the presence of different intracanal materials: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:195–202.
Rovaris K, Melo SLS, Queiroz PM, Loch C, Schwass DR, Haiter-Neto F. Beam hardening correction tool improves the diagnosis of incipient caries lesions in Micro-CT images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20180123.
Ruiz DC, Farias-Gomes A, Fontenele RC, Gaêta-Araujo H, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ, et al. Influence of extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023;135:539–47.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2013. p. 177.
Nascimento EH, Gaêta-Araujo H, Vasconcelos KF, Freire BB, Oliveira-Santos C, Haiter-Neto F, et al. Influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;47:20180100.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mouzinho-Machado S, Borges GB, Pacheco-de-Oliveira-Mota V, de-Azevedo-Vaz SL. Does enhancement filter application increase the diagnostic accuracy of misfit detection at the implant-prosthesis interface? J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131: 1136–43.
Li CW, Lin SY, Chou HS, Chen TY, Chen YA, Liu SY, Liu YL, Chen CA, Huang YC, Chen SL, Mao YC, Abu PAR, Chiang WY, Lo WS. Detection of dental apical lesions using CNNs on periapical radiograph. Sensors (Basel). 2021;24:7049.
Yalcinkaya S, Künzel A, Willers R, Thoms M, Becker J. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:643–51.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Madlum DV, Gaêta-Araujo H, Brasil DM, Lima CAS, Oliveira ML, Haiter-Neto F. Influence of the file format and transmission app on the radiographic diagnosis of caries lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;132:448–55.
de Azevedo Vaz SL, Neves FS, Figueirêdo EP, Haiter-Neto F, Campos PS. Accuracy of enhancement filters in measuring in vitro peri-implant bone level. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1074–7.
Comments (0)