The US continues to battle an opioid crisis, substantially influenced by prescription opioids, with nearly 80,000 opioid-related deaths in 2023. This study aims to characterize oxycodone’s distribution in the United States (US) from 2000-23 using three data sources. Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of oxycodone were calculated from the Drug Enforcement Administration annual summary reports from the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS); the number of units and prescriptions of oxycodone per enrollee were calculated using the Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data (M-SDUD); and the number of claims and 30-day fills per enrollee and per beneficiary with a claim for oxycodone were calculated from the Medicare Part D Prescribers (M-PDP) dataset. Oxycodone MME per person in ARCOS rose +280% from 2000 to 2010 before declining, ending at +56% over the full period. At the 2010 peak Florida, Delaware, and Tennessee showed high distributions of oxycodone, while Texas and Illinois had lower amounts compared to most states. Delaware again stood out in the Medicaid data with higher numbers of units and prescriptions, along with Alaska, Arizona, Maine, and Maryland. This data also had some anomalies in the number of prescriptions in the 2000s. The Medicare data covered 2013-22, with the District of Columbia and North Dakota standing out with lower numbers of claims and 30-day fills per beneficiary compared to other states. Oxycodone distribution varied substantially between states over time. Each dataset provided complimentary insights, highlighting the importance of multi-source monitoring for assessing opioid distribution trends and informing public policy.
Competing Interest StatementBJP was (2019-21) part of an osteoarthritis research team supported by Pfizer and Eli Lilly and was supported by HRSA (D34HP31025) and the Pennsylvania Academic Clinical Research Center (01, 03, 05).
Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
ARCOS data is publicly accessible at https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/arcos/retail_drug_summary/arcos-drug-summary-reports.html. Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data is Publicly Accessible at https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/prescription-drugs/state-drug-utilization-data/index.html. Medicare Part D Prescribers data is publicly accessible at https://data.cms.gov/provider-summary-by-type-of-service/medicare-part-d-prescribers.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Comments (0)