Several dietary patterns are suggested to benefit health, potentially through DNA methylation changes. However, to what extent adherence to so-called healthy diets overlaps, whether these dietary patterns are equally beneficial, and whether they affect health outcomes through the same molecular mechanisms, remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the overlap in adherence to ten diet quality scores, and examined the associations of these scores with both biological aging markers and DNA methylation profiles. We used data from the Rhineland Study, a large population-based cohort, and validated our findings using corresponding data from the independent EPIC-Potsdam cohort. Interestingly, we found minimal overlap of participants in the top 25% of adherence across different diet quality scores. Adherence to a healthy dietary pattern was associated with reduced epigenetic age acceleration regardless of the specific dietary pattern, except for the EAT-Lancet diet. Different dietary patterns were associated with distinct methylation profiles, which however largely converged onto the same biological pathways. Our research thus indicates that general adherence to a healthy dietary pattern promotes health through similar epigenetic mechanisms, despite variations in dietary composition.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThe Rhineland Study is funded by the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE). This work was supported through the Federal Ministry of Education and Research under the Diet Body Brain Competence Cluster in Nutrition Research (grant numbers 01EA1410C and 01EA1809C) and in the framework PreBeDem - Mit Pravention und Behandlung gegen Demenz (grant number 01KX2230), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy (EXC 2151 390873048) and through SFB1454, project number 432325352, and the Helmholtz Association under the 2023 and 2024 Innovation Pool. DL is partly supported by a grant from the Alzheimer's Association (24AARFD-1192360). NAA is partly supported by a European Research Council Starting Grant (Number: 101041677). The work in EPIC-Potsdam was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the State of Brandenburg to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD; 82DZD00302 and 82DZD03D03).
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. The ethics committee of the University of Bonn's Medical Faculty approved the study, which is being conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityThe data used in this manuscript is not publicly available due to data protection regulations. Access to the Rhineland Study data can be provided to scientists in accordance with the study's Data Use and Access Policy. Requests for additional information and/or access to the datasets can be sent to RS-DUACdzne.de. Information on data access and contact details for the EPIC-Potsdam study can be obtained at https://www.dife.de/en/research/cooperations/epic-study/. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Comments (0)