Adjustments to chemotherapy protocols are common to adapt treatments to individual patient needs, yet consensus on the impact of such adjustements is lacking. We introduce ProtoDrift, a novel metric that quantifies time and dose adjustments in chemotherapies. This weighted distance enables an assessment of their impact on patient outcomes, offering more detailed analyses than the traditional Relative Dose Intensity (RDI). We compared ProtoDrift and RDI prediction performances through survival analyses on 20,808 patients across 38 groups, categorised by cancer location and treatment line at two hospitals. Without optimisation, ProtoDrift achieves either comparable or better prediction results in 71% of patient groups (27 out of 38). Once optimised, ProtoDrift surpasses the RDI C-index predictions in 89% (16 out of 18) of patient groups from the first hospital. This study confirms ProtoDrift as an advanced tool for refining chemotherapy regimen design, highlighting the critical role of time adjustments in patient outcomes.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis work benefited from a grant from the joint Inria-Inserm PhD program, from Inria PhD support, and from a government grant managed by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the France 2030 program, reference ANR-22-PESN-0007, ShareFAIR.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee of European Goerges Pompidou Hospital (AP-HP, Paris, France) gave ethical approval for this work (reference: CSE2116). The Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Bordeaux (France) gave ethical approval for this work (reference: CER-BDX202480).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Comments (0)