Alibert, D., & Thomas, M. (1991). Research on mathematical proof. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 215-230). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Andrews-Larson, C., Johnson, E., Peterson, V., & Keller, R. (2021). Doing math with mathematicians to support pedagogical reasoning about inquiry-oriented instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09450-3.

Balacheff, N. (1988). A study of students’ proving processes at the junior high school level. In I. Wirszup & R. Streit (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second UCSMP International Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 284–297). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Battey, D., & Leyva, L. A. (2016). A framework for understanding whiteness in mathematics education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 49-80.

Brown, S. A. (2014). On skepticism and its role in the development of proof in the classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 311-335.

Brown, S. A. (in press). Microcosms in the classroom: An ethnographic study of equity in inquiry-based introduction to proof courses. New directions in university proving: Honoring the legacy of John and Annie Selden. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland.

Cervia, S. (2019). Looking gender and science at micro level: Narrative identity and the socialization of master narratives. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 9(3), 37-52.

David, E. J., & Zazkis, D. (2020). Characterizing introduction to proof courses: A survey of US R1 and R2 course syllabi. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(3), 388-404.

Davis, P. J. & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Birkhauser.

Dawkins, P. C., & Weber, K. (2017). Values and norms of proof for mathematicians and students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 123-142.

Dawkins, P. C., & Zazkis, D. (2021). Using moment-by-moment reading protocols to understand students’ processes of reading mathematical proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(5), 510-538.

Dawkins, P.C., Zazkis, D., & Cook, J.P. (2022). How do transition to proof textbooks relate logic, proof techniques, and sets? PRIMUS, 32(1), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1827322

Di Martino, P., Gregorio, F., & Iannone, P. (2023). The transition from school to university in mathematics education research: New trends and ideas from a systematic literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113, 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10194-w

Garcia, R., Harris, P. E, Lewis, D., & Walker, S. (Eds.) (2023). Aspiring and inspiring: Tenure and leadership in academic mathematics. Providence, RI, USA: AMS Press.

Gueudet, G. (2008). Investigating the secondary-tertiary transition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9100-6

Hammack, R. H. (2013). Book of proof (2nd ed.). Virginia Commonwealth University.

Harris, P. E., Prieto-Langarica, A., Quiñones, V. R., Vieira, L. S., Uscanga, R., & Vindas-Meléndez, A. R. (Eds.) (2021). Testimonios: Stories of Latinx and Hispanic mathematicians (Vol. 67). Providence, RI, USA: AMS/MAA Press.

Henrich, A. K., Lawrence, E. D., Pons, M. A., & Taylor, D. G. (Eds.) (2010). Living proof: Stories of resilience along the mathematical journey. Providence, RI, USA: AMS/MAA Press.

Hottinger, S. N. (2016). Inventing the mathematician: Gender, race, and our cultural understanding of mathematics. SUNY press.

Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 358-390.

Jett, C. C., Stinson, D. W., & Williams, B. A. (2015). Communities for and with Black male students. The Mathematics Teacher, 109(4), 284-289.

Johnson, E., Caughman, J., Fredericks, J., & Gibson, L. (2013). Implementing inquiry-oriented curriculum: From the mathematicians’ perspective, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 743-760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.03.003.

Johnson, E., Keller, R., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2018). Results from a survey of abstract algebra instructors across the United States: Understanding the choice to (not) lecture. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4, 254-285.

Kalinec-Craig, C., & del Rosario Zavala, M. (2019). Crafting entry points for learning about children’s funds of knowledge: Scaffolding the Community Mathematics Exploration Module for pre-service teachers. In T. Bartell, C. Drake, A.R. McDuffie, J.M. Aguirre, E.E. Turner, & M.Q. Foote (Eds.) Transforming mathematics teacher education: An equity-based approach (pp. 43-56). Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Kuster, G., Johnson, E., Keene, K. & Andrews-Larson, C. (2018). Inquiry-oriented instruction: A conceptualization of the instructional principles, PRIMUS, 28(1), 13-30, https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1338807

Langer-Osuna, J. M., & Nasir, N. I. S. (2016). Rehumanizing the “Other” race, culture, and identity in education research. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 723-743.

Laursen, S.L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6

Lew, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2019). Linguistic conventions of mathematical proof writing at the undergraduate level: Mathematicians’ and students’ perspectives. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(2), 121–155.

Mejía-Ramos, J. P., Fuller, E., Weber, K., Rhoads, K., & Samkoff, A. (2012). An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9349-7

Melhuish, K., Dawkins, P.C., Lew, K., & Strickland, S. (2022a). Lessons learned about incorporating high-leverage teaching practices in the undergraduate proof classroom to promote authentic and equitable participation. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00200-0

Melhuish, K., Vroom, K., Lew, K., & Ellis, B. (2022b). Operationalizing authentic mathematical proof activity using disciplinary tools. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 68, 101009.

Moreau, M.P., Mendick, H., and Epstein, D. (2009). Terrified, mortified, petrified, stupefied by you … and gendered? Constructions of ‘mathematical masculinities’ in popular culture. In E. Watson (Ed.) Pimps, wimps, studs, thugs and gentlemen: Studies on media images of masculinity, (pp. 141 – 156). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

Pais, A. (2018). Book review: The limits of pluralism. In Bharath Sriraman (Ed.) Humanizing mathematics and its philosophy: Essays celebrating the 90th birthday of Reuben Hersh. Birkhäuser.

Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2008). Images of mathematicians: A new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers. ZDM, 40(4), 633-646.

Quinlan, K. M., Thomas, D. S., Hayton, A., Astley, J., Blackwood, L., Daramy, F. K., Duffin, M. Haider, M.A., Husbands, D., Joiner, R., Kay, H., Mosoeunyane, M., Turner, I., Walsh, C., & West, D. (2024). Promoting students’ interest through culturally sensitive curricula in higher education. Higher Education, 1-21.

Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O.N. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189-194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.10.001.

Schoenfeld, A.H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2013). A US perspective on the implementation of inquiry-based learning in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0531-5.

Schumacher, C., Epp, S., & Solow, D. (2015). Transition to proof. In Committee on Undergraduate Programs in Mathematics Curriculum guide to majors in the mathematical sciences. Washington DC: Mathematical Association of America. Retrieved from https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/CUPM%20Guide.pdf

Selden, A. (2012). Transitions and proof and proving at tertiary level. In G. Hanna & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education. New ICMI study series (pp. 391–420). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_17

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4-36.

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2013). The genre of proof. In M. N. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: Searching for common ground (pp. 248–251). New York, NY: Springer.

Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237–266). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Tall, D. (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 5-24.

Tan, P., Padilla, A., & Lambert, R. (2022). A critical review of educator and disability research in mathematics education: A decade of dehumanizing waves and humanizing wakes. Review of Educational Research, 92(6), 871-910.

Thurston, W.P. (1994). On proof and progress in mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 161-177.

Weber, K. & Melhuish, K. (2022). Can we engage students in authentic mathematical activity while embracing critical pedagogy? A commentary on the tensions between disciplinary activity and critical education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 22, 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00221-6

Yeh, C., & Otis, B. M. (2019). Mathematics for whom: Reframing and humanizing mathematics. Occasional Paper Series, 41, 8. https://doi.org/10.58295/2375-3668.1276

Yoshinobu, S., & Jones, M. G. (2012). The coverage issue. PRIMUS, 22(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2010.507622