Applicability of tooth cementum thickness as an age marker: systematic review and meta-analysis

Birimiša M, Dumančić J, Vodanović M et al (2021) Forensic determination of dental age by cementum thickness of human teeth. J Forensic Odontostomatol 39(3):41–48

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Machado CEP, Deitos AR, Velho JA, Cunha E (2022) Tratado De Antropologia Forense - Fundamentos e metodologias aplicadas à prática Pericial, 1st edn. Millenium, São Paulo

Google Scholar 

Gustafson G (1950) Age determinations on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 41(1):45–54

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bertrand B (2019) Age-at-death estimation by cementochronology – somewhere between indifference and overconfidence. Forensic Sci Int 302(1):109886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109886

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kvaal SI, Solheim T (1995) Incremental lines in human dental cementum in relation to age. Eur J Oral Sci 103(1):225–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00164.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kvaal SI, Solheim T, Bjerketvedt D (1996) Evaluation of preparation, staining and microscopic techniques for counting incremental lines in cementum of human teeth. Biotech Histochem 71(4):165–172. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520299609117155

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bertrand B, Cunha E, Bécart A, Gosset D, Hédouin V (2019) Age at death estimation by cementochronology: too precise to be true or too precise to be accurate? Am J Phys Anthropol 169(3):464–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23849

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bertrand B, Oliveira-Santos I, Cunha E (2019) Cementochronology: a validated but disregarded method for age at death estimation. In: Adserias-Garriga J (ed) Age estimation: a multidisciplinary approach. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier, London, United Kingdom, San Diego, CA, United States, pp 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814491-6.00012-1

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Lieberman DE, Meadow RH (1992) The biology of cementum increments (with an archaeological application). Mamm Rev 22(2):57–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1992.tb00120.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Stott GG, Sis RF, Levy BM (1982) Cemental annulation as an age criterion in forensic dentistry. J Den Res 61(1):814–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610063401

Article  Google Scholar 

Phulari RGS, Dave EJ (2021) Evolution of dental age estimation methods in adults over the years from occlusal wear to more sophisticated recent techniques. Egypt J Forensic Sci 11(36):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00250-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Shylaja S, Manay SM, Ganji KK et al (2022) Dentinal translucency and width of cementum: predicting the age over 55 years in south Indian adults using extracted sectioned teeth. J Forensic Odontostomatol 40(2):10–20

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Solheim T (1990) Dental Cementum apposition as an indicator of age. Eur J Oral Sci 98(6):510–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb01006.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Pinchi V, Forestieri AL, Calvitti M (2007) Thickness of the dental (radicular) cementum: a parameter for estimating age. J Forensic Odontostomatol 25(1):1–6

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

The Joanna Briggs Institute (2020) Checklist for analytical cross sectional studies. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. Accessed 05 June 2023

Harrer M, Cuijpers P, Furukawa T, Ebert D (2021) Doing Meta-analysis with R: a Hands-On Guide. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton and London. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003107347

Book  Google Scholar 

Olkin I, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA (2012) GOSH – a graphical display of study heterogeneity. Res Synth Methods 3(3):214–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1053

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Furuya-Kanamori L, Barendregt JJ, Doi SAR (2018) A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc 16(4):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dias PEM, Beaini TL, Melani RFH (2010) Age estimation from dental cementum incremental lines and periodontal disease. J Forensic Odontostomatol 28(1):13–21

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amariti ML, Restori M, De Ferrari F et al (1999) Age determination by teeth examination: a comparison between different morphologic and quantitative analyses. J Clin Forensic Med 6(2):85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1353-1131(99)90205-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kasetty S, Rammanohar M, Raju Ragavendra T (2010) Dental cementum in age estimation: a polarized light and stereomicroscopic study. J Forensic Sci 55(3):779–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01363.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zou KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG (2003) Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 227(3):617–622. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2273011499

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zander HA, Hürzeler B (1958) Continuous cementum apposition. J Dent Res 37(6):1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345580370060301

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smid JR, Rowland JE, Young WG et al (2004) Mouse cellular cementum is highly dependent on growth hormone status. J Dent Res 83(1):35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300107

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pinto PHV, Fares LC, Silva RHA (2022) Dental age estimation by cementum incremental lines counting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Forensic Sci Int 341(1):111492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111492

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif