Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy - Comparative Outcomes of Powered vs. Non - Powered Instrument Techniques in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Sweeney A, Sweeney A, Burkat CN, Yen MT, Yen MT (2020) Secondary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, pp 1–1

Google Scholar 

Herzallah I, Alzuraiqi B, Bawazeer N, Marglani O, Alherabi A, Mohamed SK, Al-Qahtani K, Al-Khatib T, Alghamdi A (2015) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR): a comparative study between powered and non-powered technique. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 44:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-015-0109-zPMID: 26694716; PMCID: PMC4688968

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA (2005) External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology 112(8):1463–1468

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wormald PJ, Tsirbas A (2009) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Operative Techniques Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surg 20(2):92–95

Article  Google Scholar 

Ahmed El-Sharkawy M, Amin M (2020) Powered versus non-powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Al-Azhar Med J 49(3):1209–1220. https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2020.91640

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim SY, Paik JS, Jung SK, Cho WK, Yang SW (2013) No thermal tool using methods in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: no cautery, no drill, no illuminator, no more tears. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(10):2677–2682

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wormald PJ (2002) Powered endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 112(1):69–72 PMID: 11802041

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Codère F, Denton P, Corona J (2010) Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a modified technique with preservation of the nasal and lacrimal mucosa. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 26(3):161

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gurler B, San I (2004) Long-term follow-up outcomes of non-laser intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: how suitable and useful are conventional surgical instruments? Eur J Ophthalmol 14(6):453–460

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Badilla J, Dolman PJ (2007) Cerebrospinal fluid leaks complicating orbital or oculoplastic surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 125(12):1631

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Çukurova IMD, Bulğurcu SMD, Arslan, Ilker Burak MD, Dikilitaş, Bünyamin MD Comparison of Piezosurgery and Hammer-Chisel in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 29(6): p 1612–1613, September 2018. | https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004602

Basak, B., Biswas, K.D., Biswas, S. and Choudhary, A. 2019. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: Advantage over External Approach. Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery. 27, 2 (Aug. 2019), 161–166.

Su PY (2018 Jan-Mar) Comparison of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy for treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 8(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_10_18PMID: 29675345; PMCID: PMC5890579

Trimarchi M, Resti A, Vinciguerra A, Danè, Giulia, Bussi M (2019) Dacryocystorhinostomy: evolution of endoscopic techniques after 498 cases. Eur J Ophthalmol 30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672119854582

Reddy DS (2024) Feb. Clinical Study on Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) between Powered and Non-Powered Techniques. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, vol. 9, no. 28, 13 July 2020, p. 2012+. Gale OneFile:Health and Medicine, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A632435263/HRCA?u = anon ∽ 70095fbb&sid = googleScholar&xid = 4c27bda2. Accessed 22

Dinc ME, Ulusoy S, Sahin E, Bozan N, Avincsal MO, Tutar B, Uyar Y (2018) The use of an ostial stent does not increase the success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 132(8):718–723 Epub 2018 Jul 12. PMID: 29998809

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hiremath R, Kulkarni S, Satyamurthy K, Jain A (2019) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), raising the bars. IP Int J Ocular Oncol Oculoplasty 5:24–27. https://doi.org/10.18231/2581-5016.2019.0006

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar S, Mishra AK, Sethi A et al (2018) Comparing outcomes of the Standard Technique of Endoscopic DCR with its modifications: a retrospective analysis. Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surg 160(2):347–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818813123

Article  Google Scholar 

Kingdom TT, Barham HP, Durairaj VD (2020) Long-term outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation. Laryngoscope 130(1):12–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27989Epub 2019 Apr 25. PMID: 31021411

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saratziotis A, Emanuelli E, Gouveris H, Babighian G (2009) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: creating a window with a drill without use of mucosal flaps. Acta Otolaryngol 129(9):992–995

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naraghi M, Tabatabaii Mohammadi SZ, Sontou AF, Farajzadeh Deroee A, Boroojerdi M (2012) Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: how to achieve optimal results with simple punch technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(5):1445–1449

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gras-Cabrerizo JR, Montserrat-Gili JR, León-Vintró X, Lopez-Vilas M, Rodríguez-Álvarez F, Bonafonte-Royo S et al Endonasalendoscopic scalpel forceps

dacryocystorhinostomy vs endocanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (2013) Eur J Ophthalmol 23(1):7–12

Article  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif