El Haddad M, Taghji P, Phlips T, Wolf M, Demolder A, Choudhury R, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, Nakagawa H, Duytschaever M (2017) Determinants of acute and late pulmonary vein reconnection in contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: identifying the weakest link in the ablation chain. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 10:e004867

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ariyarathna N, Kumar S, Thomas SP, Stevenson WG, Michaud GF (2018) Role of contact force sensing in catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: evolution or history repeating itself? JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:707–723

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petersen HH, Chen X, Pietersen A, Svendsen JH, Haunsø S (2000) Tissue temperatures and lesion size during irrigated tip catheter radiofrequency ablation: an in vitro comparison of temperature-controlled irrigated tip ablation, power-controlled irrigated tip ablation, and standard temperature-controlled ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:8–17

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sun Y, Zhu X, Nakamura K, Wang S (2023) Evaluation of lesion characteristics and baseline impedance on high-power short-duration radiofrequency catheter ablation using computer simulation. Heart Vessels 38:1459–1467

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Enomoto Y, Nakamura K, Ishii R, Toyoda Y, Asami M, Takagi T, Hashimoto H, Hara H, Sugi K, Moroi M, Nakamura M (2021) Lesion size and adjacent tissue damage assessment with high power and short duration radiofrequency ablation: comparison to conventional radiofrequency ablation power setting. Heart Vessels 36:1438–1444

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ali-Ahmed F, Goyal V, Patel M, Orelaru F, Haines DE, Wong WS (2019) High-power, low-flow, short-ablation duration-the key to avoid collateral injury? J Interv Card Electrophysiol 55:9–16

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dello Russo A, D’Angelo L, Compagnucci P, Cipolletta L, Parisi Q, Valeri Y, Campanelli F, Volpato G, Carboni L, Ciliberti G, Stronati GE, Barbarossa A, La Piscopia V, Bondavalli B, Guerra F, Natale A, Casella M (2024) High-power short-duration catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: is it really a new era? Comparison between new and old radiofrequency contact force-sensing catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 67:549–557

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim JA, Khan K, Kherallah R, Khan S, Kamat I, Ulhaq O, Marashly Q, Chelu MG (2023) Innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66:737–756

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barkagan M, Leshem E, Rottmann M, Sroubek J, Shapira-Daniels A, Anter E (2019) Expandable lattice electrode ablation catheter: a novel radiofrequency platform allowing high current at low density for rapid, titratable, and durable lesions. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 12:e007090

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Masnok K, Watanabe N (2022) Catheter contact area strongly correlates with lesion area in radiofrequency cardiac ablation: an ex vivo porcine heart study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 63:561–572

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuroda M, Takeo A, Kobayashi H, Kuji R, Mori H, Tsutsui K, Fukunaga M, Nagashima M, Korai K, Ando K, Hiroshima K (2024) Influence of the irrigation flow pattern and catheter tip design on the lesion formation: an ex vivo experimental model. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 67:589–597

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, Dirnagl U, Emerson M, Garner P, Holgate ST, Howells DW, Karp NA, Lazic SE, Lidster K, MacCallum CJ, Macleod M, Pearl EJ, Petersen OH, Rawle F, Reynolds P, Rooney K, Sena ES, Silberberg SD, Steckler T, Würbel H. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biol 18:e3000410

Kumar S, Barbhaiya CR, Balindger S, John RM, Epstein LM, Koplan BA, Tedrow UB, Stevenson WG, Michaud GF (2015) Better lesion creation and assessment during catheter ablation. J Atr Fibrillation 8:1189

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wittkampf FHM, Nakagawa H, Foresti S, Aoyama H, Jackman WM (2005) Saline-irrigated radiofrequency ablation electrode with external cooling. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16:323–328

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, Sharma T, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM (2014) Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:1174–1180

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seiler J, Roberts-Thomson KC, Raymond JM, Vest J, Delacretaz E, Stevenson WG (2008) Steam pops during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: feasibility of impedance monitoring for prevention. Heart Rhythm 5:1411–1416

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Theis C, Rostock T, Mollnau H, Sonnenschein S, Himmrich E, Kämpfner D, Ocete BQ, Bock K, Münzel T, Konrad T (2015) The incidence of audible steam pops is increased and unpredictable with the ThermoCool® Surround Flow Catheter during left atrial catheter ablation: a prospective observational study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26:956–962

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bourier F, Popa M, Kottmaier M, Maurer S, Bahlke F, Telishevska M, Lengauer S, Koch-Büttner K, Kornmayer M, Risse E, Brkic A, Reents T, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I (2021) RF electrode-tissue coverage significantly influences steam pop incidence and lesion size. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 32:1594–1599

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nguyen DT, Zipse M, Borne RT, Zheng L, Tzou WS, Sauer WH (2018) Use of tissue electric and ultrasound characteristics to predict and prevent steam-generated cavitation during high-power radiofrequency ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:491–500

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Natale A, Albenque JP, Kautzner J, Shah D, Michaud G, Wharton M, Harari D, Mahapatra S, Lambert H, Mansour M (2015) Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact force-sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the TactiCath Contact Force ablation Catheter Study for atrial fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) study. Circulation 132:907–915

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Calzolari V, De Mattia L, Indiani S, Crosato M, Furlanetto A, Licciardello C, Squasi PAM, Olivari Z (2017) In vitro validation of the lesion size index to predict lesion width and depth after irrigated radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3:1126–1135

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knecht S, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, Schaer B, Osswald S, Sticherling C, Kühne M (2015) Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 43:297–306

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

González-Suárez A, Berjano E, Guerra JM, Gerardo-Giorda L (2016) Computational modeling of open-irrigated electrodes for radiofrequency cardiac ablation including blood motion-saline flow interaction. PLoS ONE 11:e0150356

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ho SY, Sanchez-Quintana D, Cabrera JA, Anderson RH (1999) Anatomy of the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 10:1525–1533

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hall B, Jeevanantham V, Simon R, Filippone J, Vorobiof G, Daubert J (2006) Variation in left atrial transmural wall thickness at sites commonly targeted for ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 17:127–132

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanamori N, Kato T, Sakagami S, Saeki T, Kato C, Kawai K, Chikata A, Takashima SI, Murai H, Usui S, Furusho H, Kaneko S, Takamura M (2018) Optimal lesion size index to prevent conduction gap during pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29:1616–1623

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, Lam A, Martin CA, Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Frontera A, Cheniti G, Pambrun T, Klotz N, Denis A, Derval N, Cochet H, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Jais P (2018) High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: insights on lesion metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 29:1570–1575

Article  Google Scholar 

Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E (2018) High power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:467–479

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah DC, Lambert H, Leo G, Aeby N, Ikeda A, Pitha JV, Sharma T, Lazzara R, Jackman WM (2008) Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 1:354–362

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, Schmidt B, Saoudi N, Herrera C, Jaïs P, Hindricks G, Peichl P, Yulzari A, Lambert H, Neuzil P, Natale A, Kuck KH (2012) The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm 9:1789–1795

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakagawa H, Jackman WM (2014) The role of contact force in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Atr Fibrillation 7:1027

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Winterfield JR, Jensen J, Gilbert T, Marchlinski F, Natale A, Packer D, Reddy V, Mahapatra S, Wilber DJ (2016) Lesion size and safety comparison between the novel flex tip on the FlexAbility ablation Catheter and the solid tips on the ThermoCool and ThermoCool SF ablation Catheters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27:102–109

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vitali F, De Raffele M, Malagù M, Balla C, Azzolini G, Gibiin