Kang Ch, Hashitsume K, Jang E, Kolya H. Relationship between Wood Anatomical Features and Surface Roughness Characteristics. In: Wood Research, 68 (3), 455–464, 2023.

Balderrama ÍF, de Toledo Stuani V, Cardoso MV, Oliveira RC, Lopes MMR, Greghi, SLA. The influence of implant surface roughness on decontamination by antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and chemical agents: A preliminary study in vitro. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 33, p. 102105, 2021.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martinez MAF, Balderrama ÍDF, Karam PSBH, de Oliveira RC, de Oliveira FA, Grandini CR, et al. Surface roughness of titanium disks influences the adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of osteogenic properties derived from human. International journal of implant dentistry, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2020.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri, KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods, v. 9, n. 7, p. 671-675, 2012.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khalil S, El-Badri N, El-Mokhtaar M, Al Mofty S, Farghaly M, Ayman R, et al. A Cost-Effective Method to Assemble Biomimetic 3D Cell Culture Platforms. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0167116, 2016.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Collins TJ. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques, v. 43, n. S1, p. S25-S30, 2007.

Google Scholar 

Calandra I, Bob K, Merceron G, Blateyron F, Hildebrandt A, Schulz-Kornas E, et al. Surface texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results?. Peer Community Journal, 2(e77), 2022. https://peercommunityjournal.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.204/.

Yadhuraj SR, Satheesh Babu G, Uttara Kumari M. Measurement of thickness and roughness using gwyddion. 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), pp 1–5, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS.2016.7586314.

Chinga G, Johnsen PO, Dougherty R, Berli EL, Walter J. Quantification of the 3D microstructure of SC surfaces. Journal of Microscopy, 227(3), 254–265, 2007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mendes GN, Takeshita WM, Brasileiro BF, Trento CL. Comparative effect of the extended use of acids for surface treatment of osseointegrated implants. A laboratory study. J Osseointegration, 16(1), 65–71, 2024.

Google Scholar 

Van Pham K, Vo CQ. A new method for assessment of nickel-titanium endodontic instrument surface roughness using field emission scanning electronic microscope. BMC Oral Health, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2020.

Google Scholar 

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone. Impl Res. 20(Suppl 4):172–84, 2016.

Google Scholar 

Romero M, Herrero-Climent M, Ríos-Carrasco B, Brizuela A, Romero MM, Gil J. Investigation of the Influence of Roughness and Dental Implant Design on Primary Stability via Analysis of Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient: An In Vitro Study. J. Clin. Med, 12(4190), 2023.

Alla RK, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya N, Shammas M, Ravi RK, Sekhar R. Surface roughness of implants: a review. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs, 25(3), 112-118, 2011.

Google Scholar 

ISO 25178–2:2012 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: Areal, Part 1: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters.