LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3(1):39–41.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramshaw BJ, Esartia P, Schwab J, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg. 1999;65(9):827–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kudsi OY, McCarty JC, Paluvoi N, Mabardy AS. Transition from laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair to robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective review of a single surgeon’s experience. World J Surg. 2017;41:2251–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ye L, Childers CP, de Virgilio M. Clinical outcomes and cost of robotic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. BJS Open. 2021;5:zrab098.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Collins CE, Renshaw S, Huang LC. Robotic vs open approach for older adults undergoing retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2023;277(4):697–703.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Tache-Leon CA. Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot? Surg Endosc. 2018;32:2131–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kolachalam R, Dickens E, D’Amico L. Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institu- tional, retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:229–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bittner Iv JG, Cesnik LW, Kirwan T. Correction to: patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches. J Robot Surg. 2019;13:191.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sanchez A, Rodriguez O, Jara G. Robot-assisted surgery and incisional hernia: a comparative study of ergonomics in a training model. J Robot Surg. 2018;12:523–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prabhu AS, Dickens EO, Copper CM. Laparoscopic vs robotic intraperitoneal mesh repair for incisional hernia: an Americas hernia society quality collaborative analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225:285–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bittner JGT, Alrefai S, Vy M. Comparative analysis of open and robotic trans- versus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:727–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M. Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2253–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liang MK, Clapp M, Li LT. Patient satisfaction, chronic pain, and functional status following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. World J Surg. 2013;37:530–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Booth JH, Garvey PB, Baumann DP. Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:999–1009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miserez M, Lefering R, Famiglietti F. Synthetic versus biological mesh in laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair (LAPSIS): results of a multinational, randomized, controlled, and double-blind. Trial Ann Surg. 2021;273(1):57–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T. Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(2):217–28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanters AE, Krpata DM, Blatnik JA, Novitsky YM, Rosen MJ. Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):787–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Working group Incisional Hernias. National Guideline for Treatment of Incisional Ventral Hernias. https://richtlijnendatabasenl/richtlijn/littekenbreuken/startpagina_-_littekenbreukenhtml#algemeen. 2018.

Parker SG, Halligan S, Liang MK, Muysoms FE, Adrales GL, Boutall A, et al. Definitions for loss of domain: an international Delphi consensus of expert surgeons. World J Surg. 2020;44(4):1070–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

GaskinsJ Huang LI, McPhail L, O’Connor S. Robotic approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair may be associated with improved wound morbidity in high-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10630-9. (This article underscored the significance of employing a robotic approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair, particularly in high-risk patients).

Article  Google Scholar 

Nguyen B, David B, Shiozaki T. Comparisons of abdominal wall reconstruction for ventral hernia repairs, open versus robotic. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8086.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bittner JG 4th, Alrefai S, Vy M. Comparative analysis of open and robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):727–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

LeBlanc KA, Gonzalez A, Dickens E, Prospective Hernia Study Group. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open incisional hernia repair: early outcomes from the prospective hernia study. Hernia. 2021;25(4):1071–82 (Multicenter prospective observational study from 17 medical institutions within the United States evaluating robotic, laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair and revealed short-term outcomes indicate that open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches are effective surgical approaches to VIH repair; however, each repair technique may demonstrate advantages in terms of clinical outcomes. Beside they found that operation time in the robotic vs open comparison is similar).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dewulf M, Hiekkaranta JM, Mäkäräinen E. Open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic posterior component separation in complex abdominal wall repair. BJS Open. 2022;6(3):zrac057.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kudsi OY, Kaoukabani G, Bou-Ayash N. A comparison of clinical outcomes and costs between robotic and open ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2023;226(1):87–92 (In this study, it was shown that the costs were equally distributed in robotic and open ventral hernia repair groups. Their findings indicated that lower postoperative complications resulted in reduced post-discharge expenses, ultimately leading to comparable total costs between the two groups).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kudsi OY, Gokcal F, Bou-Ayash N, Chang K. Comparison of midterm outcomes between open and robotic emergent ventral hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2021;28(4):449–57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guzman-Pruneda FA, Huang LC, Collins C. Abdominal core quality of life after ventral hernia repair: a comparison of open versus robotic-assisted retromuscular techniques. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(1):241–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS. Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas hernia society quality collaborative. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):210–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdu R, Vasyluk A, Reddy N. Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release versus open: propensity-matched analysis of 30-day outcomes. Hernia. 2021;25(6):1491–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Shah SK. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2020;370: m2457.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dhanani NH, Olavarria OA, Holihan JL. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: two-year results from a prospective, multicenter, blinded randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2023;278(2):161–5 (This study was prospective, multicenter, blinded randomized clinical trial. They found that robotic ventral hernia repair demonstrated at least similar if not improved outcomes at 2 years compared with laparoscopy. There is potential benefit with robotic repair).

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petro CC, Thomas JD, Tu C. Robotic vs laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh: 1-year exploratory outcomes of the PROVE-IT randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;234(6):1160–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gonzalez AM, Romero RJ, Seetharamaiah R. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary closure versus no primary closure of the defect: potential benefits of the robotic technology. Int J Med Robot. 2015;11(2):120–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dhanani NH, Olavarria OA, Holihan JL. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: one-year results from a prospective, multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2021;273(6):1076–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petro CC, Zolin S, Krpata D. Patient-reported outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh: the PROVE-IT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(1):22–9.