The Argus II retinal prosthesis restores visual perception to late blind patients. It has been shown that structural changes occur in the brain due to late-onset blindness, including cortical thinning in visual regions of the brain. Following vision restoration, it is not yet known whether these visual regions are reinvigorated and regain a normal cortical thickness or retain the diminished thickness from blindness.

We evaluated the cortical thicknesses of ten Argus II Retinal Prostheses patients, ten blind patients, and thirteen sighted participants. The Argus II patients on average had a thicker left Cuneus Cortex and Lateral Occipital Cortex relative to the blind patients. The duration of the Argus II use (time since implant in active users) significantly partially correlated with thicker visual cortical regions in the left hemisphere. Furthermore, in the two case studies (scanned before and after implantation), the patient with longer device use (44.5 months) had an increase in the cortical thickness of visual regions, whereas the shorter-using patient did not (6.5 months). Finally, a third case, scanned at three time points post-implantation, showed an increase in cortical thickness in the Lateral Occipital Cortex between 43.5 and 57 months, which was maintained even after 3 years of disuse (106 months).

Overall, the Argus II patients’ cortical thickness was on average significantly rejuvenated in two higher visual regions and, patients using the implant for a longer duration had thicker visual regions. This research raises the possibility of structural plasticity reversing visual cortical atrophy in late-blind patients with prolonged vision restoration.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

We are grateful for support from the National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute (1U01EY025864-01); the National Institutes of Health, the BRAIN Initiative (5K99EY031987-02); the Arnold O. Beckman Postdoctoral Scholars Fellowship Program; the USC Roski Eye Institute; and the Philanthropic Educational Organization Scholar Award Program.

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Institutional Review Board approval was granted at the University of Southern California, where the study was carried out.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Data Availability Statement: Neuroimaging data will be made available through the Connectome Coordination Facility (CCF) (https://www.humanconnectome.org/).