Background: Corneal lenticules can be banked and retrieved for vision-restoring surgeries. Extended transportation logistic delays from the lenticule bank to the clinic could be a concern. This study investigated the effects of transportation on the lenticules. Methods: Lenticules were cryopreserved at a Ministry of Health-licensed lenticule bank for 1 year and were transported at 4oC. The transparency was measured daily until significant degradation was notable, compared to fresh lenticules from donor corneas (n=3). The molecular and ultrastructural integrity of lenticules after 1 day in transport (n=3) and on the day of transparency deterioration (n=3) was evaluated by histochemistry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition, 6 rabbits were implanted with these lenticules to assess the difference in postoperative outcomes by corneal imaging, immunofluorescence staining, and TEM. Results: Lenticules showed a significant transparency reduction after 6 days in transit (p=0.002). The change was not caused by molecular alterations but by a greater distribution shift in the interfibrillar distance (IFD) (Z=4.419; p<0.001) and fibrillar diameter (FD) (Z=6.435; p<0.001). Post-implantation, day 6 lenticules exhibited greater haze and slower recovery of clarity compared to fresher lenticules, despite corneal imaging and immunofluorescence staining showing no fibrosis, inflammation, or vascularization in either group. With TEM, the discrepancy was revealed due to the difference in the recovery of IFD and FD distribution. Conclusions: Banked lenticules can maintain transparency for up to 5 days of transportation at 4oC. Further delays compromise their ultrastructural integrity and postoperative clarity, emphasizing the need to factor in transportation in lenticule banking logistics.
Competing Interest StatementJ.S.M. is a medical advisor for Cordlife Singapore and Carl Zeiss Meditec. The rest of the authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding StatementThis study was funded by NMRC Clinician Scientist Award-Senior Investigator (MOH-000197-00) and The Lee Foundation Grant (R1917/45/2022)
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of SingHealth-Duke-NUS waived ethical approval for this work because the provision and consent taking of the tissues were carried out by the U.S. eyebank and Singapore lenticule bank, who were not involved in the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
Comments (0)