Modified delayed coloanal anastomosis following TME for mid and low rectal cancer: 19 consecutive patients from a single center

Qu H, Liu Y, Bi D (2015) Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 29:3608–3617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4117-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME et al (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9697

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01719.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJFX et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4219

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6594

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J et al (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Murken DR, Bleier JIS (2019) Ostomy-related complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 32:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676995

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rutegård M, Häggström J, Back E et al (2023) Defunctioning loop ileostomy in anterior resection for rectal cancer and subsequent renal failure: nationwide population-based study. BJS Open 7:zrad010. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad010

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B et al (1999) Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1569–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236209

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ayaz-Alkaya S (2019) Overview of psychosocial problems in individuals with stoma: a review of literature. Int Wound J 16:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13018

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bianco F, Belli A, De Franciscis S et al (2016) “Scarless” and no-stoma surgery for low rectal cancer: the laparoscopic pull-through delayed “high” colo-anal anastomosis. Updates Surg 68:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0358-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bianco F, Falato A, Belli A et al (2017) Modified pull-through technique with a delayed high coloanal anastomosis: no stoma and scarless surgery for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 60:1113. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000897

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bianco F, Novi A, Incollingo P et al (2022) The short stump and high anastomosis pull-through procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer - a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 24:801–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16087

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2014) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12:1495–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013

Article  Google Scholar 

Bendib H (2023) Stoma-free modified pull-through delayed coloanal anastomosis. ANZ J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.18818

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bianco F, Incollingo P, Falato A et al (2021) Short stump and high anastomosis pull-through (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis with no protective stoma for low rectal cancer. Updates Surg 73:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01022-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Spinelli A, Anania G, Arezzo A et al (2020) Italian multi-society modified Delphi consensus on the definition and management of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Updates Surg 72(3):781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00837-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Salvans S, Mayol X, Alonso S et al (2014) Postoperative peritoneal infection enhances migration and invasion capacities of tumor cells in vitro: an insight into the association between anastomotic leak and recurrence after surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 260:939–943. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000958

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu Y, Zheng H, Guo T et al (2017) Temporary diverting stoma improves recovery of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Sci Rep 7:15930. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16311-7

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chapman WC, Subramanian M, Jayarajan S et al (2019) First, do no harm: rethinking routine diversion in sphincter-preserving rectal cancer resection. J Am Coll Surg 228:547-556.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.012

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Phatak UR, Kao LS, You YN et al (2014) Impact of ileostomy-related complications on the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:507–512. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3287-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pan H-D, Peng Y-F, Wang L et al (2016) Risk factors for nonclosure of a temporary defunctioning ileostomy following anterior resection of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000520

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Babcock WW (1989) William Wayne Babcock 1872–1963. The operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectosigmoid with methods for the elimination of colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 32:442–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563702

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baulieux J, Olagne E, Ducerf C et al (1999) Oncologic and functional results of resections with direct delayed coloanal anastomosis in previously irradiated cancers of the lower rectum. Chirurgie 124:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-4001(99)80089-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barugola G, Bertocchi E, Gentile I et al (2018) Hostile pelvis: how to avoid permanent stoma. Updates Surg 70(4):459–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0555-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lavryk OA, Justiniano CF, Bandi B et al (2023) Turnbull-cutait pull-through procedure is an alternative to permanent ostomy in patients with complex pelvic fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 66:1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002920

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jarry J, Faucheron J-L (2011) Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection with transanal colonic pull-through and delayed coloanal anastomosis: a new approach to adult Hirschsprung disease. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1313–1319. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182270c41

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guner OS, Tumay LV (2021) Turnbull-Cutait technique without ileostomy after total mesorectal excision is associated with acceptably low early post-operative morbidity. ANZ J Surg 91:132–138.

Comments (0)

No login
gif