American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e756–85.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gerharz EW, Haarmann C. The first cut is the deepest? Medicolegal aspects of male circumcision. BJU Int. 2000;86:332–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

WHO. Manual for male circumcision under local anesthesia and HIV prevention services for adolescent boys and men. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

Abdulwahab-Ahmed A, Mungadi IA. Techniques of male circumcision. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2013;5:1–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shabanzadeh DM, Clausen S, Maigaard K, Fode M. Male Circumcision Complications – A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Urology. 2021;152:25–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hargreave T. Male circumcision: towards a World Health Organization normative practice in resource limited settings. Asian J Androl. 2010;12:628–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.59

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kiggundu V, Watya S, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Nalugoda F, Buwembo D, et al. The number of procedures required to achieve optimal competency with male circumcision: findings from a randomized trial in Rakai, Uganda. BJU Int. 2009;104:529–32.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fan Y, Cao D, Wei Q, Tang Z, Tan P, Yang L, et al. The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25514.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li S, Zhang L, Wang DW, Yang S, Mu HQ, Nan CJ, et al. Clinical application of the disposable circumcision suture device in male circumcision. Natl J Androl. 2014;20:816–9.

Google Scholar 

Jin XD, Lu JJ, Liu WH, Zhou J, Yu RK, Yu B, et al. Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015;48:577–82.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lv BD, Zhang SG, Zhu XW, Zhang J, Chen G, Chen MF, et al. Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:453–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Miao HD, Lu JW, Lu FN, Shen F, Yuan XL, Liu HY. Clinical effects of the circumcision stapler, foreskin cerclage, and traditional circumcision: A comparative study. Natl J Androl. 2015;21:334–7.

Google Scholar 

Huo ZC, Liu G, Li XY, Liu F, Fan WJ, Guan RH, et al. Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:362–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Z, Yang B, Yu W, Han Y, Xu Z, Chen H, et al. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48:465–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Zhou Y, Xia S, Zhu Z, Jia L, Liu Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel disposable circumcision device: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial at 2 centers. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:454–62.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yuan Y, Zhang Z, Cui W, Gao B, Peng J, Xin Z, et al. Clinical investigation of a novel surgical device for circumcision. J Urol. 2014;191:1411–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shen J, Shi J, Gao J, Wang N, Tang J, Yu B, et al. A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Disposable Circumcision Suture Devices in Adult Males. Urol J. 2017;14:5013–7.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3:CD012250.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Munevveroglu C, Gunduz M. Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36:91–5.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar