Alvi Rizqi Amaliyah, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, IndonesiaFollow
Haris Budi Widodo, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, IndonesiaFollow
Irfan Dwiandhono, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, IndonesiaFollow
Nanohybrid composite resin is a dental restorative material comprising micro and nano-sized fillers. When accompanied by smoking habits, it can alter the surface roughness of composite resin. Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of several electric cigarette (e-cigarette) puffs on the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resin. Methods: This study was conducted in the experimental laboratory with a pretest-posttest control group design using 48 nanohybrid composite resin specimens divided into six groups. Subsequently, the experimental groups were exposed to 75, 150, 225, 300, and 450 puffs of e-cigarette, and the control group was given artificial saliva immersion without exposure for 21 days. The surface roughness of specimens was measured with a surface roughness tester and evaluated through statistical analysis, including One-Way ANOVA and Post-Hoc LSD. Results: The average pre-test and post-test differences between groups I, II, III, IV, V, and VI were 0.013, 0.022, 0.033, 0.044, 0.065, and 0.005 μm. These results showed a significant difference in the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resin (p Conclusion: This study showed that the number of e-cigarette puffs had a significant effect on the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resin. Specifically, an increase in the number of e-cigarette puffs led to a rise in the surface roughness value of nanohybrid composite resin.
References1. National Health Research 2018. Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. 2018. Available from: https://repository.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/ id/eprint/3514/.
2. Sobczak, A., Kosmider, L. Advantages and disadvantages of electric cigarettes. Toxics. 2023; 11(66): 1-3.
3. Food And Drug Administration. Enforcement Priorities for Electric Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) and Other Deemed Products on the Market Without Premarket Authorization (Revised). Food and Drugs Administration. 2020.
4. Kulhanek, A., Baptistova, A. Chemical composition of electric cigarette e-liquids: Overview of current evidence of toxicity. Adiktologie. 2020; 20 (3- 4):137-144.
5. Ablelo FO, Kusuma FHD, Rosdiana Y. The relationship between the frequency of smoking with stress level in late adolescents. Nurs News Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan. 2019; 4(1):133-44.
6. Marques, P., Piquares. L., Sanz, Maria-Jesus. An update overview of e- cigarette impact on human health. Respiratory Res. 2021; 22 (151): 1-14.
7. Anusavice K, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2013. p. 281-5.
8. Hatrick CD, Eakle WS. Dental materials clinical applications for dental assistants and dental hygienists. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016. p. 7.
9. Reziae HR, Rizi HB, Khamseh MMR, Öchsner A. A review on dental materials. Switzerland: Springer; 2020. p. 139.
10. Ansuj MDF, dos Santos IS, Marquezan M, Durand LB, Pozzobon RT. Evaluation of the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different smoothing and finishing techniques. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2016; 45(2):110- 4.
11. Alandia-Roman, C., Cruvinel, D. R., Pnazeri, H.Effect of cigarette smoke on color stability and surface roughness of dental composites. J Dent. 2012; 3:e73-9.
12. Harvanko AM, Havel CM, Jacob P, Benowitz NL. Characterization of nicotine salts in 23 electronic cigarette refill liquids. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 22(7):1239-43.
13. Diansari, V., Ningsih, D. S., Amini, H. Surface roughness evaluation of nanofiller composite resin after immersion in 50% calamansi orange juice (Citrus Microcarpa). J Syiah Kuala Dentistry Society. 2021; 6(1): 12-17
14. Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental materials. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2013. p. 73-92.
15. Chandra J, Setyowati L, Setyabudi. Surface roughness of nanofilled and ubah composite resins exposed to kretek cigarette smoke. Conserv Dent J. 2019; 8(1):30-5.
16. Roselino Lde M, Cruvinel DR, Chinelatti MA, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Effect of brushing and accelerated ageing on color stability and surface roughness of composites. J Dent. 2013; 41 Suppl 5:e54-61.
17. Mahross HZ, Mohamed MD, Hassan AM, Baroudi K. Effect of cigarette smoke on surface roughness of different denture base materials. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(9):ZC39-42.
18. Zakiyah D, Effendy R, Arif EA. The effect of glycerin on the surface hardness and roughness of nanofilled composite. Conserv Dent J. 2019; 8(2):104-11.
19. Mitutoyo America Corporation. Quick guide to surface roughness measurement: Reference guide for laboratory and workshop. Aurora, IL: Mitutoyo American Corporation, 2016.
20. Dautzenberg B , Bricard D. Real-time characterization of e-cigarettes use: The 1 million puffs study. J Addict Res Ther. 2015; 6(2):229.
21. Hamano N, Chiang YC, Nyamaa I, Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Effect of different surface treatments on the repair strength of a nanofilled resin-based composite. Dent Mater J. 2011; 30(4):537-45.
22. Chen W, Wang P, Ito K, Fowles J, Shusterman D, Jaques PA, Kumagai K. Measurement of heating coil temperature for e-cigarettes with a “top-coil” clearomizer. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0195925.
23. Ko TJ, Kim SA . Effect of heating on physicochemical property of aerosols during vaping. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1892.
24. Farsalinos KE, Polosa R. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: A systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014; 5(2):67-86.
25. Biradar, B., Biradar, S. Arvind, M.S. Evaluation of three effect of water on three different light cured composite restorative materials stored in water: An in vitro study. Int J Dent. 2012; 2012(5): 1-6.
26. Sadeler, R., Saedi, A., Keles, S. In vitro investigation of the effect of preheating, thermal cycling, and different chewing environtment temperature on the wear of dental composite resins. Mat Tech. 2021; 37(12): 2073-89.
27. Yofarindra BM, Damiyanti M, Herda E. Effects of immersion in mouthwash for different durations and with different ethanol concentrations on the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resin. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018; 1073(3):032002.
28. Elwardani G, Sharaf AA, Mahmoud A. Evaluation of colour change and surface roughness of two resin-based composites when exposed to beverages commonly used by children: An in-vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019; 20(3):267-76.
29. Sakaguchi R, Ferracane J, Powers J. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2019. p. 19.
30. Tvarijonaviciute A, Martínez-Subiela S, López- Jornet P, Lamy E. Saliva in health and disease. Switzerland: Springer; 2020. p. 11-5.
31. Sikora CL, Alfaro MF, Yuan JC, Barao VA, Sukotjo C, Mathew MT. Wear and corrosion interactions at the titanium/zirconia interface: Dental implant application. J Prosthodont. 2018; 27(9):842-52.
32. Buzalaf MA, Hannas AR, Kato MT. Saliva and dental erosion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012; 20(5):493- 502.
33. DA Silva MA, Vitti RP, Sinhoreti MA, Consani RL, Silva-Júnior JG, Tonholo J. Effect of alcoholic beverages on surface roughness and microhardness of dental composites. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35(4):621-6.
Comments (0)