Wurm EM, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Wurm R, Soyer HP. Telemedicine and teledermatology: past, present and future. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008;6(2):106–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06440.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miller J, Jones E. Shaping the future of teledermatology: a literature review of patient and provider satisfaction with synchronous teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(11):1903–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.15320.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hadeler E, Gitlow H, Nouri K. Definitions, survey methods, and findings of patient satisfaction studies in teledermatology: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res. 2021;313(4):205–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02110-0.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pathipati AS, Lee L, Armstrong AW. Health-care delivery methods in teledermatology: consultative, triage and direct-care models. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(4):214–6. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2010.010002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ranpariya V, Kats D, Lipoff JB. Direct-to-consumer teledermatology growth: a review and outlook for the future. Cutis. 2022;109(4):211–7. https://doi.org/10.12788/cutis.0503.

Kochmann M, Locatis C. Direct to consumer mobile teledermatology apps: an exploratory study. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(8):689–93. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0189.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Asabor EN, Bunick CG, Cohen JM, Perkins SH. Patient and physician perspectives on teledermatology at an academic dermatology department amid the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(1):158–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.029. Highlights the benefits of teledermatology in terms of time and travel savings.

• Chang M, Lipner S. Disparities in telemedicine satisfaction among older and non-White dermatology patients: a cross-sectional study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(2):210–4. https://doi.org/10.36849/jdd.6410. Highlights privacy concerns among non-White and older populations regarding the use of teledermatology.

Ruggiero A, Megna M, Annunziata MC, Abategiovanni L, Scalvenzi M, Tajani A, et al. Teledermatology for acne during COVID-19: high patients’ satisfaction in spite of the emergency. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(11):e662–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16746.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Kohn LL, Pickett K, Day JA, Torres-Zegarra C, Plost G, Gurnee E, et al. When is synchronous telehealth acceptable for pediatric dermatology? Pediatr Dermatol. 2022;39(2):236–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.14919. Indicates that the type of encounter and the nature of the disease can influence patients’ future willingness to participate in teledermatology.

Hamad J, Fox A, Kammire MS, Hollis AN, Khairat S. Evaluating the experiences of new and existing teledermatology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Dermatol. 2021;4(1):e25999. https://doi.org/10.2196/25999.

Pearlman RL, Le PB, Brodell RT, Nahar VK. Evaluation of patient attitudes towards the technical experience of synchronous teledermatology in the era of COVID-19. Arch Dermatol Res. 2021;313(9):769–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-020-02170-2.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Watson AJ, Bergman H, Williams CM, Kvedar JC. A randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of online follow-up visits in the management of acne. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(4):406–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2010.29.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Frühauf J, Schwantzer G, Ambros-Rudolph CM, Weger W, Ahlgrimm-Siess V, Salmhofer W, et al. Pilot study on the acceptance of mobile teledermatology for the home monitoring of high-need patients with psoriasis. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53(1):41–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00852.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Kaunitz G, Yin L, Nagler AR, Sicco KL, Kim RH. Assessing patient satisfaction with live-interactive teledermatology visits during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(4):591–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0200. Points out the need for improvement in the physical examination aspect of live interactive teledermatology.

Moore B, Washington A, Butt M, Silva C, Green B, Helm M. Patient satisfaction of real-time teledermatology: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Dermatol. 2022;61(2):e69–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.15618.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fiks AG, Fleisher L, Berrigan L, Sykes E, Mayne SL, Gruver R, et al. Usability, acceptability, and impact of a pediatric teledermatology mobile health application. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(3):236–45. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0075.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pathipati AS, Ko JM. Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116659089. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116659089.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rimner T, Blozik E, Fischer Casagrande B, Von Overbeck J. Digital skin images submitted by patients: an evaluation of feasibility in store-and-forward teledermatology. Eur J Dermatol. 2010;20(5):606–10. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2010.1019.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marbouh D, Khaleel I, Al Shanqiti K, Al Tamimi M, Simsekler MCE, Ellahham S, et al. Evaluating the impact of patient no-shows on service quality. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:509–17. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S232114.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Naka F, Lu J, Porto A, Villagra J, Wu ZH, Anderson D. Impact of dermatology eConsults on access to care and skin cancer screening in underserved populations: a model for teledermatology services in community health centers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(2):293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.017.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nelson CA, Takeshita J, Wanat KA, Bream KD, Holmes JH, Koenig HC, et al. Impact of store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology on outpatient dermatologic care: a prospective study in an underserved urban primary care setting. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(3):484-90.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.058.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gorrepati PL, Smith GP. Analysis of availability, types, and implementation of teledermatology services during COVID-19. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(3):958–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.022.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Afanasiev OK, Hung DY, Yan S, Huang SJ, Cho BK. COVID-19: a catalyst for innovative hybrid teledermatology workflows to increase access and improve patient care at a large group practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(1):206–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.098.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Block DJ, Bosworth MF. Contrast sensitivity vision testing: new screening technology for family physicians. Am Fam Physician. 1992;45(2):655–9.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shah N, Kassamali B, Lee MS, Kus K, LaChance AH, Vleugels RA, et al. Evaluating patient experience and satisfaction with teledermatology for isotretinoin management: a structured qualitative interview study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022;33(5):2698–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2062277.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee S, Dana A, Newman J. Teledermatology as a tool for preoperative consultation before Mohs micrographic surgery within the Veterans Health Administration. Dermatol Surg. 2020;46(4):508–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002073.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Handa S, Mehta H, Bishnoi A, Vinay K, Mahajan R, Narang T, et al. Teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience at a tertiary care centre in North India. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(4):e15022. https://doi.org/10.1111/dth.15022.

Faucon C, Gribi D, Courvoisier DS, Senet P, Itani O, Barbaud A, et al. Performance accuracy, advantages and limitations of a store-and-forward teledermatology platform developed for general practitioners: a retrospective study of 298 cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2022;149(4):245–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annder.2022.01.012.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Shaikh S, Armbrecht ES, Kansara V, Sethupathi S, Darji K, Chaudhry SB. Patient and provider experience and outcomes with synchronous teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAAD Int. 2022;8:131–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2022.06.006. Emphasizes the importance of helping patients increase their technical literacy for the success of teledermatology.

Sendagorta E, Servera G, Nuño A, Gil R, Pérez-España L, Herranz P. Direct-to-patient teledermatology during COVID-19 lockdown in a health district in Madrid, Spain: the EVIDE-19 Pilot Study. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2021;112(4):345–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2020.11.020.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahmood F, Cyr J, Keely E, Afkham A, Guglani S, Walker J, et al. Teledermatology utilization and integration in residency training over the COVID-19 pandemic. J Cutan Med Surg. 2022;26(2):135–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754211045393.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Briggs SM, Lipoff JB, Collier SM. Using implementation science to understand teledermatology implementation early in the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study. JMIR Dermatol. 2022;5(2):e33833. https://doi.org/10.2196/33833. Emphasizes that fair reimbursement is an ongoing concern for the future of teledermatology.

Kennedy J, Arey S, Hopkins Z, Tejasvi T, Farah R, Secrest AM, et al. Dermatologist perceptions of teledermatology implementation and future use after COVID-19: demographics, barriers, and insights. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(5):595–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0195.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Duniphin DD. Limited access to dermatology specialty care: barriers and teledermatology. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(1). https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1301a31.

Fluhr JW, Gueguen A, Legoupil D, Brenaut E, Abasq C, Araújo H, et al. Teledermatology in times of COVID-19 confinement: comparing patients’ and physicians’ satisfaction by the standardized brest teledermatology questionnaire. Dermatology. 2021;237(2):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514029.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giavina-Bianchi M, Sousa R, Cordioli E. Part I: Accuracy of teledermatology in inflammatory dermatoses. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:585792. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585792.

Giavina-Bianchi M, Azevedo MFD, Sousa RM, Cordioli E. Part II: Accuracy of teledermatology in skin neoplasms. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:598903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.598903.

Using telehealth to expand access to essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://public4.pagefreezer.com/browse/CDC%20Covid%20Pages/11-05-2022T12:30/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/telehealth.html. Accessed June 2023.

Vestergaard T, Andersen MK, Bygum A. Acceptance of teledermoscopy by general practitioners and dermatologists in Denmark. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(2):e2021033. https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1102a33.

Kimball AB, Porter ML. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the delivery of dermatological care. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022;11(4):313–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-022-00378-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lin SK, Deitermann AM, Miller CJ, Garg A, Ungar J, Nguyen HP. Evolving teledermatology policy and reimbursement landscape in the United States. JAAD Int. 2023;11:200–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2023.03.006.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Choi EC, Heng LW, Tan SY, Phan P, Chandran NS. Factors influencing use and perceptions of teledermatology: a mixed-methods study of 942 participants. JAAD Int. 2022;6:97–103.