Electrophysiology and Arrhythmia: Research Article
Mao Y. · Ai L.-J. · Cai Y.-H. · Huang Q.-Y. · Yu F.-L. · Chen J.-X. · Huang P.-F. · Wang H.Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details AbstractIntroduction: Data on first-line ablation treatment for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) are scarce. This study indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) vs. radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as initial therapy for symptomatic AF. Methods: We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CBA or RFA with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as first-line treatment for AF from the time of database establishment up to December 2021. The odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of the treatment effect. Results: Six RCTs (3 CBA, 3 RFA) that enrolled a total of 1215 patients were included in this analysis. There were no significant differences in atrial arrhythmia (AA) (OR 0.993, 95% CI 0.602–1.638), symptomatic AA (OR 0.638, 95% CI 0.344–1.182), or serious adverse events (OR 1.474, 95% CI, 0.404–5.376) between the two ablation techniques. The incidences of additional CBA therapy (OR 2.693, 95% CI 1.277–5.681) and patients who crossed over to AAD therapy (OR 0.345 95% CI 0.179–0.664) in the CBA group were significantly lower than that in the RFA group. Conclusion: Among patients with paroxysmal AF receiving initial therapy, CBA and RFA share a similar efficacy and safety profile. When pulmonary vein isolation is performed by CBA, study crossover and the need for additional ablation are substantially lower.
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Comments (0)