21-week routine antenatal ultrasound scan – Diagnosis of gastroschisis
Ravi Shanker Singh, Vikrant Bardhan, Sunil Kumar, Sonal Saran
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sonal Saran
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand
India
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_43_21
A 24-year-old female presented to the obstetrics outpatient clinic for a routine antenatal checkup at 21 weeks of gestation. This was her first pregnancy, and there was no history of previous miscarriage. Earlier, the ultrasound was done at around 10 weeks of gestation, which was normal. Her physical examination was unremarkable. An ultrasound scan was performed for the patient, which is shown in [Figure 1] and Video 1. What is your interpretation?
On ultrasound examination, there was a large paraumbilical abdominal wall defect (approximately 3.5 cm) seen right to the midline. The umbilical cord insertion was normal. The bowel loops were seen eviscerated through the abdominal wall defect. Eviscerated bowel loops were mildly dilated. The liver and stomach were also seen herniating through the defect. The entire herniated contents were not seen surrounded by any membrane [[Figure 1] and Video 1][Additional file 1].
Next day, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to evaluate the abnormality. An abdominal wall defect was seen adjacent to intact umbilical cord insertion on MRI images, while bowel loops were seen freely floating in amniotic fluid. The bowel loops were not surrounded by any membrane. No associated anomalies such as bowel atresia or stenosis were seen. The liver and stomach were also seen herniating through the defect [Figure 2]. Diagnosis of gastroschisis was made based on characteristic ultrasound and MRI findings. The pregnancy was terminated at the patient's request. The imaging findings were confirmed on the fetal autopsy.
The prevalence and incidence of gastroschisis are 1/4000 and 0.4–2.3/10,000 live births, respectively.[1],[2] The differentiation of gastroschisis from other anterior abdominal wall defects such as omphalocele, body stalk anomaly, bladder, and cloacal exstrophy, and pentalogy of Cantrell is made by prenatal imaging. Evaluation of the defect is critical in the differentiation of these anomalies. The final outcome is affected by the presence of additional structural anomalies; hence, finding anterior abdominal wall defect requires further assessment by targeted ultrasonography, MRI, echocardiography, and karyotyping.[3]
Abdominal wall defect includes a broad spectrum of disorders. Detection and categorization of various types of abdominal wall defects on ultrasonography are essential because of their impact on management, prenatal counseling, the appropriate mode of delivery, prenatal transfer to the appropriate health-care center, and surgical closure method as precise prenatal characterization can affect the outcome.[3] The difference between gastroschisis and omphalocele is shown in [Table 1].
Initially, vascular insult was considered the cause of gastroschisis, but now, the abnormality of lateral wall folding with deficient mesenchyme is considered the cause of gastroschisis. Maternal smoking, abuse of vasoactive substances, and younger maternal age are considered risk factors for gastro schisis. There is no sex predilection. The mortality rate for gastroschisis is 10%–15%, and the risk of death depends on the degree of bowel abnormality, herniation of other viscera such as liver and stomach, and low birth weight.[4] Liver and stomach herniation through gastroschisis is extremely rare and is associated with high mortality.[5]
Our case presented at 21 weeks of gestation with gastroschisis associated with liver and gastric herniation. The learning objective behind presenting this case is the importance of prenatal ultrasound in diagnosing the abdominal wall defects and recognizing the importance of differentiating between the two most common abdominal wall defects for appropriate patient management. Our case also had liver and gastric herniation, which is extremely rare.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
Comments (0)