Biomimetics, Vol. 7, Pages 244: Balanced Standing on One Foot of Biped Robot Based on Three-Particle Model Predictive Control

Conceptualization, Y.Y. and J.S.; methodology, Y.Y., W.C., S.H. and Q.L.; software, Y.Y., J.S., W.C. and Q.L.; validation, Y.Y.; formal analysis, Y.Y. and J.S.; investigation, Y.Y. and J.S.; resources, M.Z.; data curation, Y.Y., J.S. and Y.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y., J.S., S.H. and Y.G.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., Y.Y., J.S., S.H., Y.G., W.C., X.C. and X.L.; visualization, Y.Y. and Y.G.; supervision, M.Z. and X.L.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Figure 1. Three-Particle Model.

Figure 1. Three-Particle Model.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g001

Figure 2. Overall control framework.

Figure 2. Overall control framework.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g002

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of collision experiment.

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of collision experiment.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g003

Figure 4. CoM position of the robot under the frontal impact of a 9 kg rigid ball.

Figure 4. CoM position of the robot under the frontal impact of a 9 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g004

Figure 5. CoM position of the robot under the frontal impact of an 11 kg rigid ball.

Figure 5. CoM position of the robot under the frontal impact of an 11 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g005

Figure 6. Swing foot position of the robot under the frontal impact of a 9 kg rigid ball.

Figure 6. Swing foot position of the robot under the frontal impact of a 9 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g006

Figure 7. Swing foot position of the robot under the frontal impact of an 11 kg rigid ball.

Figure 7. Swing foot position of the robot under the frontal impact of an 11 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g007

Figure 8. Screenshots of the motions generated by our method in the frontal impact test.

Figure 8. Screenshots of the motions generated by our method in the frontal impact test.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g008

Figure 9. Centroidal pitch angular momentum of the robot under the frontal impact of a 9 kg rigid ball.

Figure 9. Centroidal pitch angular momentum of the robot under the frontal impact of a 9 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g009

Figure 10. Centroidal pitch angular momentum of the robot under the frontal impact of an 11 kg rigid ball.

Figure 10. Centroidal pitch angular momentum of the robot under the frontal impact of an 11 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g010

Figure 11. Computation time cost of TP-MPC in the frontal impact test. (a) 9 kg ball; (b) 11 kg ball.

Figure 11. Computation time cost of TP-MPC in the frontal impact test. (a) 9 kg ball; (b) 11 kg ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g011

Figure 12. CoM position of the robot under the side impact of a 2.7 kg rigid ball.

Figure 12. CoM position of the robot under the side impact of a 2.7 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g012

Figure 13. CoM position of the robot under the side impact of a 3.2 kg rigid ball.

Figure 13. CoM position of the robot under the side impact of a 3.2 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g013

Figure 14. Swing foot position of the robot under the side impact of a 2.7 kg rigid ball.

Figure 14. Swing foot position of the robot under the side impact of a 2.7 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g014

Figure 15. Swing foot position of the robot under the side impact of a 3.2 kg rigid ball.

Figure 15. Swing foot position of the robot under the side impact of a 3.2 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g015

Figure 16. Centroidal roll angular momentum of the robot under the side impact of a 2.7 kg rigid ball.

Figure 16. Centroidal roll angular momentum of the robot under the side impact of a 2.7 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g016

Figure 17. Centroidal roll angular momentum of the robot under the side impact of a 3.2 kg rigid ball.

Figure 17. Centroidal roll angular momentum of the robot under the side impact of a 3.2 kg rigid ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g017

Figure 18. Screenshots of the motions generated by our method in the side impact test.

Figure 18. Screenshots of the motions generated by our method in the side impact test.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g018

Figure 19. Computation time cost of TP-MPC in the side impact test. (a) 2.7 kg ball; (b) 3.2 kg ball.

Figure 19. Computation time cost of TP-MPC in the side impact test. (a) 2.7 kg ball; (b) 3.2 kg ball.

Biomimetics 07 00244 g019

Table 1. Tasks, Constraints, and Priority Setting of Whole-Body Control for Single Leg Balance Standing.

Table 1. Tasks, Constraints, and Priority Setting of Whole-Body Control for Single Leg Balance Standing.

PriorityTasksTasks DimensionConstraintsConstraints Dimension1Floating Base Dynamics6Joint Torque102Linear Momentum6ZMP9Torso PostureFriction Cone3Foot Position & Posture16 Contact Wrench

Comments (0)

No login
gif