All studies investigating Punica granatum L. in association with oral and precancerous cancer were considered potentially admissible; no restrictions were applied in relation to the year of publication and based on the language provided that an abstract in English was available. Literature reviews were excluded and were used only as sources for bibliographic research.
2.3. Information SourcesThe search was carried out on three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Science Direct) and a register (Cochrane library); in addition, a gray literature search was performed on Google scholar and Opengray (DANS EASY Archive); potentially eligible articles were also searched among references from literature reviews on Punica granatum L.
The research was conducted between 1 August 2022 and 15 August 2022, with a last update of the records identified on 19 August 2022.
2.4. SearchThe authors responsible for researching the studies used the following key words in the databases: punica granatum AND cancer. The key words used on PubMed are shown below; Search: punica granatum AND cancer (“pomegranate” (MeSH Terms)) OR “pomegranate” (All Fields) OR (“punica” (All Fields)) AND “granatum” (All Fields) OR “punica granatum” (All Fields) AND (“cancer s” (All Fields)) OR “cancerated” (All Fields) OR “canceration” (All Fields) OR “cancerization” (All Fields) OR “cancerized” (All Fields) OR “cancerous” (All Fields) OR “neoplasms” (MeSH Terms) OR “neoplasms” (All Fields) OR “cancer” (All Fields) OR “cancers” (All Fields).Translations, punica granatum: “pomegranate” (MeSH Terms) OR “pomegranate” (All Fields) OR (“punica” (All Fields) AND “granatum” (All Fields)) OR “punica granatum” (All Fields) cancer: “cancer’s” (All Fields) OR “cancerated” (All Fields) OR “canceration” (All Fields) OR “cancerization” (All Fields) OR “cancerized” (All Fields) OR “cancerous” (All Fields) OR “neoplasms” (MeSH Terms) OR “neoplasms” (All Fields) OR “cancer” (All Fields) OR “cancers” (All Fields).
2.5. Selection of Sources of EvidenceThe search for eligible articles and reports was conducted by 2 reviewers (D.S. and M.D.) with a 3rd reviewer (G.A.C.) with the task of choosing whether to include the studies in situations of conflict.
The 2 reviewers after having established in agreement: the eligibility criteria, the keywords and the databases to be used, independently performed the search for articles and reports, reporting on tables the number of articles obtained for each keyword and for each database used; studies that resulted in duplicates from different databases were deleted using the EndNote 9 software (Philadelphia, PA, USA); study overlays that could not be uploaded to EndNote were manually removed by the authors after the screening phase. The 2 reviewers then proceeded to the screening and inclusion of the studies with the comparison and debate on the studies to be included.
2.6. Data Charting Process, Data Items, Synthesis of ResultsThe characteristics and type of data to be extracted from the studies were jointly decided by the 2 reviewers immediately after the study selection phase; the data concerned: the first author, the year of publication, the bibliographic reference, the type of study, the type of oral carcinoma investigated, the cell lines tested, the type of active ingredient tested, the main results and conclusions of the study. The data were extracted independently by the 2 reviewers in 2 different tables and subsequently compared and reported in a 3rd table with 3 reviewers who verified the correct insertion of the data.
2.7. Risk of BiasThe risk or bias was calculated using the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (QUIN Tool). The QUIN tool includes 12 points along with scoring and classification options to allow clinicians to assess the quality of in vitro studies; the tool has also been validated in dentistry, where results are presented by Sheth et al. [39].For each criterion, a score was applied as follows: Adequately Specified (Score = 2), Inadequately Specified (Score = 1), Not Specified (Score = 0), Not Applicable.
The scores thus obtained were used to grade the in vitro study as high, medium or low risk (>70% = low risk of bias, 50% to 70% = medium risk of bias and <50% = high risk of bias) by using the following formula: Final score = Total score × 100\2 × number of criteria applicable.
The risk of bias was calculated by the first reviewer with a comparison with the 2nd reviewer in case of doubt.
Studies presenting high risk or bias were excluded from the scoping review.
4. DiscussionThe authors performed a scoping review on the effects and potential uses of Punica granatum extracts on oral cancer; the review aims to summarize all the potential effects described in the literature. A preliminary analysis revealed the absence of studies conducted on patients with oral carcinoma or head and neck tumors; there are only in vitro studies on cell lines in which the main histological variant investigated was OSCC, as it emerges from the cell lines used (CAL27, SCC9, Ca9-22, HSC-3). The studies therefore identified and included in the review were seven in number.
From the analysis of the data in the literature, a clear inhibiting effect on cell proliferation in vitro emerges in almost all cell lines. In fact, the cytotoxic power was confirmed by a recent study by Gao et al., 2020, on four oral carcinoma cell lines (HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4 and Ca9-22) [44]. Moreover, the results on the reduction of cell proliferation are confirmed by the study of Seeram et al. 2005 [45], which indicates how the extracts of Punica granatum contain antioxidants capable of reducing the oxidative stresses that are one of the mechanisms responsible for mutations.Specifically, different formulations can be identified with which the in vitro tests were performed: POMx (in capsule formulation containing powder), pomegranate juice extracts containing tannins and polyphenols and gold nanoparticles containing Punica granatum peel.
POMx is marketed both in the form of juice and powder concentrate formed from the peel, membrane and pith of pomegranate fruit, in which the main characteristic bioactive components are ellagitann ellagitannins (punicalagin and punicalin) and ellagic acid [47].In the in vitro studies by Peng et al. [42] and Weisburg et al., 2010 [40], the powed formulation is used, which is obtained as described by Rasheed et al. [48], by extracting the pomegranate residue after pressing for juice and solid phase extraction to produce a powder with a high concentration of polyphenols. The concentration of substances would be the following: 86.0% ellagitannins, 2.5% ash, 3.2% sugars, 1.9% organic acids as citric acid equivalents, 0.8% nitrogen and 1.2% humidity. The percentage content of polyphenols was roughly divided into 19% ellagitannins such as punicalagin and punicalin, 4% free ellagic acid and 77% oligomers consisting of 2–10 repeated units of gallic acid, ellagic acid and glucose in different combinations [48].As an alternative to the powder usually supplied in capsules, the second main formulation used is POM (Wonderful, LLC, Los Angeles, California) [45] or more generally pomegranate juice [46], or some main elagittannins (punicalagin) contained in the extracts as in Morsy et al., 2019 [41].In the context of oral cavity tumors, the studies focused on two histological subtypes, OSCC and epidermal carcinoma of the mouth. In the first case, the cell lines used referred to tumors that were primarily localized in the gingival (Ca9- 22), tongue (CAL27, SCC9, HSC-3, HSC-4) and retromolar trigone area (SCC1483), or indicatively of the oral cavity (HSC-2); for the second histotype, the cell line used is the KB (the cell line may have contamination from the HeLa line, which appears to be cervical cancer) [49] (Figure 4).The anticancer action of Punica granatum extracts is exerted through three main mechanisms: through the induction of apoptosis and through the inhibition of proliferation and invasion [50].Oxidative stress is one of the mechanisms by which Punica granatum extracts can act by inducing apoptosis; the mechanism involves the generation of H2O2 with the depletion of glutathione; this mechanism has been observed and demonstrated for HSC2 oral cancer cell lines in the study of Weisburg et al., 2010 [40].Therefore, the increase in ROS in oral cancer cells would be at the basis of apoptotic events, which also involve a reduction in the number of copies of mtDNA.
Moreover, there would also be an inhibiting effect on mitochondrial biogenesis with a reduction of the mitochondrial mass through the inhibition of the mRNA. Oral cancer cells treated with extracts of Punica granatum would undergo mitochondrial fission with consequent cellular apoptosis.
The anti-proliferative action against tumor cells is exerted through a generally cytotoxic effect performed at high concentrations with an apoptotic effect involving the inhibition of the phosphorylation of the MAPK family proteins such as JNK ERK1\2 and p38.
The antitumor action aimed at inhibiting tumor migration invasion is expressed through the suppression of the EMT process. In fact, Peng et al. demonstrate that EMT transcription factors (Slug and Twist) and mesenchymal markers (vimentin and N-cadherin) are downregulated [51], while the epithelial marker (E-cadherin) mRNA levels are upregulated in HSC-3 cell lines compared to control after 24 h of exposure to POMx [42,43].Additional indirect anticancer mechanisms may be the antimicrobial activity detected by Kasimsetty et al., 2007 [52], with an antiplasmidial action presenting an inhibitory action also against candida albicans; these microorganisms are involved in some forms of oral pre-cancers [53] and the possibility of keeping them under control with a diet that includes the intake of Punica granatum extracts could be a prevention strategy. It should be added that the antioxidant capacity contained in the extracts of Punica granatum represents a determining factor in reducing the oxidative stress responsible for the mutagenic potential of cancer cells, mutations potentially involving tumor suppressor genes such as p53 [54] (Figure 5).A strong limitation to this purpose review is the absence of clinical studies conducted on oral carcinomas; however, the risk of publication bias has been minimized through research on gray literature sources [55].
Comments (0)