Surgical management of lung cancer: history, evolution, and modern advances.

Curr Oncol Rep. 2018; 20: 98Farivar A.S. Cerfolio R.J. Vallières E. et al.

Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

Innovations (Phila). 2014; 9: 10-15Louie B.E. Farivar A.S. Aye R.W. et al.

Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93 ([discussion: 1604–5]): 1598-1604Wei B. Eldaif S.M. Cerfolio R.J.

Robotic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016; 25: 515-531Yang Y. Li B. Yi J. et al.

Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE Trial.

Ann Surg. 2022; 275: 646-653van der Sluis P.C. van der Horst S. May A.M. et al.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 621-630

New technology and health care costs: the case of robot-assisted surgery.

N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 701Resnick A.S. Corrigan D. Mullen J.L. et al.

Surgeon contribution to hospital bottom line: not all are created equal.

Ann Surg. 2005; 242 ([discussion: 537–9]): 530-537Wagner O.J. Louie B.E. Vallières E. et al.

Near-infrared fluorescence imaging can help identify the contralateral phrenic nerve during robotic thymectomy.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94: 622-625Sarkaria I.S. Bains M.S. Finley D.J. et al.

Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging as an adjunct to robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Innovations. 2014; 9: 391-393Galetta D. Casiraghi M. Pardolesi A. et al.

New stapling devices in robotic surgery.

J Vis Surg. 2017; 3: 45Onwugbufor M.T. Predina J.D. Osho A.A. et al.

10 commandments of robotic lobectomy.

Innovations (Phila). 2021; 16: 123-126Estes S.J. Goldenberg D. Winder J.S. et al.

Best practices for robotic surgery programs.

Jsls. 2017; 21Cerfolio R.J. Bryant A.S. Minnich D.J.

Starting a robotic program in general thoracic surgery: why, how, and lessons learned.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91: 1729-1737

Training in robotic thoracic surgery.

J Vis Surg. 2018; 4: 1Lee B.E. Korst R.J. Kletsman E. et al.

Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147: 724-729

Simulation-based training in robotic surgery: contemporary and future methods.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021; 31: 556-560Finnegan K.T. Meraney A.M. Staff I. et al.

da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance.

Urology. 2012; 80: 330-335Artsen A.M. L SB Duvvuri U. et al.

Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery.

J Robot Surg. 2022; 16: 563-568Bhora F.Y. Al-Ayoubi A.M. Rehmani S.S. et al.

Robotically assisted thoracic surgery: proposed guidelines for privileging and credentialing.

Innovations (Phila). 2016; 11: 386-389Alicuben E.T. Wightman S.C. Shemanski K.A. et al.

Training residents in robotic thoracic surgery.

J Thorac Dis. 2021; 13: 6169-6178

A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Surg Endosc. 2008; 22 ([discussion: 311–2]): 313-325Cerfolio R.J. Cichos K.H. Wei B. et al.

Robotic lobectomy can be taught while maintaining quality patient outcomes.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 152: 991-997Raza S.J. Froghi S. Chowriappa A. et al.

Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum: a multi-institution prospective study.

J Surg Educ. 2014; 71: 316-324Kent M.S. Hartwig M.G. Vallières E. et al.

Pulmonary Open, Robotic and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: an analysis of 5,721 cases.

Ann Surg. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005115Kaur M.N. Xie F. Shiwcharan A. et al.

Robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection during early program development.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1050-1057Worrell S.G. Dedhia P. Gilbert C. et al.

The cost and quality of life outcomes in developing a robotic lobectomy program.

J Robot Surg. 2019; 13: 239-243Singer E. Kneuertz P.J. D'Souza D.M. et al.

Understanding the financial cost of robotic lobectomy: calculating the value of innovation?.

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 8: 194-201Nasir B.S. Bryant A.S. Minnich D.J. et al.

Performing robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: cost, profitability, and outcomes.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98 ([discussion: 208–9]): 203-208Nawalaniec J.T. Elson M. Reznik S.I. et al.

Training cardiothoracic residents in robotic lobectomy is cost-effective with no change in clinical outcomes.

Innovations (Phila). 2022; 17: 127-135