Bray F. Ferlay J. Soerjomataram I. et al.

Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424View in Article Scopus (47819) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarMalhotra G.K. Yanala U. Ravipati A. et al.

Global trends in esophageal cancer.

J Surg Oncol. 2017; 115: 564-579View in Article Scopus (189) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarNCCN

Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

JNCCN. 2019; 17: 883-885View in Article Google ScholarFinks J.F. Osborne N.H. Birkmeyer J.D.

Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2128-2137View in Article Scopus (980) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarLow D.E. Kuppusamy M.K. Alderson D. et al.

Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.

Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 291-298View in Article Scopus (321) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarMartin J.T. Federico J.A. McKelvey A.A. et al.

Prevention of delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: a single center's experience with botulinum toxin.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87 ([discussion: 13-4]): 1708-1713View in Article Scopus (52) PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarTownsend CM Beauchamp RD Evers BM et al.Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA2017View in Article Google ScholarBiere S.S. van Berge Henegouwen M.I. Maas K.W. et al.

Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2012; 379: 1887-1892View in Article Scopus (1104) PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarMaas K.W. Biere S.S. van Hoogstraten I.M. et al.

Immunological changes after minimally invasive or conventional esophageal resection for cancer: a randomized trial.

World J Surg. 2014; 38: 131-137View in Article Scopus (33) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarStraatman J. van der Wielen N. Cuesta M.A. et al.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.

Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 232-236View in Article Scopus (285) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarDoganay E. Moorthy K.

Prehabilitation for esophagectomy.

J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11: S632-S638View in Article Scopus (13) Crossref Google ScholarJanssen T. Fransen L.F.C. Heesakkers F. et al.

Effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on postoperative recovery and morbidity in patients undergoing a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Dis Esophagus. 2022; 35: 1-8View in Article Scopus (0) Crossref Google ScholarWolff C.S. Castillo S.F. Larson D.R. et al.

Ivor Lewis approach is superior to transhiatal approach in retrieval of lymph nodes at esophagectomy.

Dis Esophagus. 2008; 21: 328-333View in Article Scopus (0) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarSchlottmann F. Strassle P.D. Patti M.G.

Transhiatal vs. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Factors for Morbidity.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21: 1757-1763View in Article Scopus (19) Crossref Google Scholarvan Workum F. Verstegen M.H.P. Klarenbeek B.R. et al.

Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Surg. 2021; 156: 601-610View in Article Scopus (19) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarYou J. Zhang H. Li W. et al.

Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Surgery. 2022; 172: 575-583View in Article Scopus (0) Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarOrringer M.B.

Transhiatal Esophagectomy: How I Teach It.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1432-1437View in Article Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholarvan Hillegersberg R. Boone J. Draaisma W.A. et al.

First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 1435-1439View in Article Scopus (0) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarSarkaria I.S. Rizk N.P. Goldman D.A. et al.

Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 920-928View in Article Scopus (39) PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholarvan der Sluis P.C. Ruurda J.P. van der Horst S. et al.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).

Trials. 2012; 13: 230View in Article Scopus (123) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarPointer Jr., D.T. Saeed S. Naffouje S.A. et al.

Outcomes of 350 Robotic-assisted Esophagectomies at a High-volume Cancer Center: A Contemporary Propensity-score Matched Analysis.

Ann Surg. 2022; 276: 111-118View in Article Scopus (6) Crossref Google ScholarOkusanya O.T. Sarkaria I.S. Hess N.R. et al.

Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center initial experience.

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6: 179-185View in Article Scopus (44) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarHarrison L.E. Yiengpruksawan A. Patel J. et al.

Robotic gastrectomy and esophagogastrectomy: A single center experience of 105 cases.

J Surg Oncol. 2015; 112: 888-893View in Article Scopus (5) Crossref Google ScholarCerfolio R.J. Wei B. Hawn M.T. et al.

Robotic Esophagectomy for Cancer: Early Results and Lessons Learned.

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 28: 160-169View in Article PubMed Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google ScholarYang Y. Li B. Yi J. et al.

Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.

Ann Surg. 2022; 275: 646-653View in Article Scopus (18) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarDeng H.Y. Huang W.X. Li G. et al.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.

Dis Esophagus. 2018; 31View in Article Scopus (33) Crossref Google ScholarMeredith K. Blinn P. Maramara T. et al.

Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy.

Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 814-820View in Article Scopus (14) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarJin D. Yao L. Yu J. et al.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Int J Med Robot. 2019; 15: e1988View in Article Scopus (41) Crossref Google ScholarNakauchi M. Uyama I. Suda K. et al.

Robot-assisted mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: the first clinical series.

Esophagus. 2019; 16: 85-92View in Article Scopus (18) PubMed Crossref Google Scholarvan Workum F. Stenstra M. Berkelmans G.H.K. et al.

Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 88-94View in Article Scopus (148) PubMed Crossref Google ScholarTapias L.F. Morse C.R.

Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve.

J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1130-1140View in Article PubMed Crossref Google Scholar