Tonometers—which one should I use?.

Eye (Lond). 2018; 32: 931-937Pakrou N Gray T Mills R Landers J Craig J.

Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

J Glaucoma. 2008; 17: 43-47

Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum.

Ophthalmology. 1996; 103: 183-185Kim KN Jeoung JW Park KH Yang MK Kim DM.

Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2013; 91: e392-e396

Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results.

Med Glas (Zenica). 2018; 15: 152-157Poostchi A Mitchell R Nicholas S Purdie G Wells A.

The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009; 37: 687-691

Icare rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use.

Clin Ophthalmol. 2018; 12: 1245-1253Nakakura S Mori E Yamamoto M Tsushima Y Tabuchi H Kiuchi Y.

Intradevice and interdevice agreement between a rebound tonometer, Icare PRO, and the Tonopen XL and Kowa hand-held applanation tonometer when used in the sitting and supine position.

J Glaucoma. 2015; 24: 515-521Grewal DS Stinnett SS Folgar FA et al.

A comparative study of rebound tonometry with Tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometry following vitreoretinal surgery.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 161: 22-28Rateb M Abdel-Radi M Eldaly Z Elmohamady MN

Noor El Din A. Comparison of IOP measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare rebound tonometer, and Tono-Pen in keratoconus patients after MyoRing implantation.

J Ophthalmol. 2019; 20191964107Nakakura S Mori E Fujio Y et al.

Comparison of the intraocular pressure measured using the new rebound tonometer iCare IC100 and iCare TA01i or Goldmann applanation tonometer.

J Glaucoma. 2019; 28: 172-177Munkwitz S Elkarmouty A Hoffmann EM Pfeiffer N Thieme H.

Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 246: 875-879Brusini P Salvetat ML Zeppieri M Tosoni C Parisi L.

Comparison of iCare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.

J Glaucoma. 2006; 15: 213-217Rodter TH Knippschild S Baulig C Krummenauer F.

Meta-analysis of the concordance of iCare PRO-based rebound and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients.

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020; 30: 245-252Nakakura S Asaoka R Terao E et al.

Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with iCare PRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.

Eye Vis (Lond). 2021; 8: 25Badakere SV Chary R Choudhari NS Rao HL Garudadri C Senthil S.

Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement of iCare IC200 with Goldmann applanation tonometer in adult eyes with normal cornea.

Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021; 4: 89-94Kato Y Nakakura S Matsuo N et al.

Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and iCare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.

Int Ophthalmol. 2018; : 687-696Guler M Bilak S Bilgin B Simsek A Capkin M Hakim Reyhan A.

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by iCare PRO rebound tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in healthy subjects.

J Glaucoma. 2015; 24: 613-618Schweier C Hanson JV Funk J Toteberg-Harms M.

Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with iCare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions.

BMC Ophthalmol. 2013; 13: 44

Measurement of intraocular pressure: a study of its reproducibility.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1976; 198: 39-43Dielemans I Vingerling JR Hofman A Grobbee DE de Jong PT.

Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994; 232: 141-144Baek SU Ha A Kim YK Jeoung JW Park KH.

Effect of manual eyelid manipulation on intraocular pressure measurement by rebound tonometry.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2018; 102: 1515-1519Park DH Choi WS Yoon SH Song CH.

Anthropometry of Asian eyelids by age.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1405-1413Na JI Kwon OS Kim BJ et al.

Ethnic characteristics of eyelashes: a comparative analysis in Asian and Caucasian females.

Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155: 1170-1176Lee GA Ritch R Liang SY et al.

Tight orbit syndrome: a previously unrecognized cause of open-angle glaucoma.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 88: 120-124Lee YK Lee JY Moon JI Park MH.

Effectiveness of the iCare rebound tonometer in patients with overestimated intraocular pressure due to tight orbit syndrome.

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2014; 58: 496-502Wong B Parikh D Rosen L Gorski M Angelilli A Shih C.

Comparison of disposable Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare IC100, and Tonopen XL to standards of care Goldmann nondisposable applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure.

J Glaucoma. 2018; 27: 1119-1124Sakamoto M Kanamori A Fujihara M Yamada Y Nakamura M Negi A.

Assessment of iCare ONE rebound tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2014; 92: 243-248Schuman JS Massicotte EC Connolly S Hertzmark E Mukherji B Kunen MZ.

Increased intraocular pressure and visual field defects in high resistance wind instrument players.

Ophthalmology. 2000; 107: 127-133van Angelen MI van Angelen JH Zegers RH.

[A saxophonist with severe glaucoma; stop playing or not?].

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014; 158: A6709Kass MA Heuer DK Higginbotham EJ et al.

The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120 (discussion 829–30.): 701-713Punjabi OS Kniestedt C Stamper RL Lin SC.

Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use.

Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 34: 837-840Moreno-Montanes J Maldonado MJ Garcia N Mendiluce L Garcia-Gomez PJ Segui-Gomez M.

Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49: 968-974Yang K Xu L Fan Q Zhao D Ren S.

Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes.

Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 15379