1. IARC . IARC handbook of cancer prevention: cervical cancer screening, Vol. 10. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005.
Google Scholar2. Polman, NJ, Snijders, PJF, Kenter, GG, et al. HPV-based cervical screening: rationale, expectations and future perspectives of the new Dutch screening programme. Prev Med 2019; 119: 108–117.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. RIVM . Monitor bevolkingsonderzoek baarmoederhalskanker 2018. Rijksoverheid, https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2019/12/20/monitor-bevolkingsonderzoek-baarmoederhalskanker-2018
Google Scholar4. van der Aa, MA, Pukkala, E, Coebergh, JWW, et al. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2008; 122(8): 1854–1858.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Yeh, PT, Kennedy, CE, de Vuyst, H, et al. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4(3): e001351.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Bos, AB, Rebolj, M, Habbema, JDF, et al. Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2006; 119(10): 2372–2375.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Rondy, M, Van Lier, A, Van de Kassteele, J, et al. Determinants for HPV vaccine uptake in the Netherlands: a multilevel study. Vaccine 2010; 28(9): 2070–2075.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Gray, TF, Cudjoe, J, Murphy, J, et al. Disparities in cancer screening practices among minority and underrepresented populations. Semin Oncol Nurs 2017; 33(2): 184–198.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Arnold, M, Aarts, MJ, van der Aa, M, et al. Investigating cervical, oesophageal and colon cancer risk and survival among migrants in The Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 2013; 23(5): 867–873.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Steens, A, Wielders, CCH, Bogaards, JA, et al. Association between human papillomavirus vaccine uptake and cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands: implications for future impact on prevention. Int J Cancer 2013; 132(4): 932–943.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Alberts, CJ, van der Loeff, MFS, Hazeveld, Y, et al. A longitudinal study on determinants of HPV vaccination uptake in parents/guardians from different ethnic backgrounds in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2017; 17(1): 1–12.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Lale, N, Ory, F, Detmar, S. Factoren die geassocieerd zijn met het niet deelnemen van Turkse vrouwen aan screening op baarmoederhalskanker. TSG Tijdschr Voor Gezondheidswetenschappen 2003; 81(4): 184.
Google Scholar13. de Jong, E, Drossaert, CHC, Boer, H, et al. Onderzoek naar de gedragsdeterminanten van Turkse vrouwen tussen 30-60 jaar bij deelname aan het bevolkingsonderzoek naar baarmoederhalskanker in de regio Twente, 2005, https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/onderzoek-naar-de-gedragsdeterminanten-van-turkse-vrouwen-tussen—2
Google Scholar14. Hamdiui, N, Marchena, E, Stein, ML, et al. Decision-making, barriers, and facilitators regarding cervical cancer screening participation among Turkish and Moroccan women in the Netherlands: a focus group study. Ethn Health 2021; 7: 1–19.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Zhao, X, Nan, X. The influence of absolute and comparative risk perceptions on cervical cancer screening and the mediating role of cancer worry. J Health Commun 2016; 21(1): 100–108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Knops-Dullens, T, de Vries, N, de Vries, H. Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: an application of the integrated model for behavioural change. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007; 16(5): 436–445.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI17. Roncancio, AM, Ward, KK, Sanchez, IA, et al. Using the theory of planned behavior to understand cervical cancer screening among Latinas. Health Educ Behav 2015; 42(5): 621–626.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI18. Verdoodt, F, Jentschke, M, Hillemanns, P, et al. Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51(16): 2375–2385.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Huynh, J, Howard, M, Lytwyn, A. Self-collection for vaginal human papillomavirus testing: systematic review of studies asking women their perceptions. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010; 14(4): 356–362.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Szarewski, A, Cadman, L, Mesher, D, et al. HPV self-sampling as an alternative strategy in non-attenders for cervical screening–a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2011; 104(6): 915–920.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. Madzima, TR, Vahabi, M, Lofters, A. Emerging role of HPV self-sampling in cervical cancer screening for hard-to-reach women: focused literature review. Can Fam Physician 2017; 63(8): 597–601.
Google Scholar | Medline22. Daponte, A, Pournaras, S, Tsakris, A. Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus detection: future cervical cancer screening. Womens Health 2014; 10(2): 115–118.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals23. RIVM . Prestatie-indicatoren bevolkingsonderzoek, 2020, https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/bevolkingsonderzoek/prestatie-indicatoren#node-deelname-bevolkingsonderzoek-baarmoederhalskanker-0
Google Scholar24. Lederman, LC . Assessing educational effectiveness: the focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Commun Educ 1990; 39(2): 117–127.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI25. Stokes, D, Bergin, R. Methodology or “methodolatry”? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews. Qual Mark Res an Int J 2006; 9: 26–37.
Google Scholar | Crossref26. Morgan, DL . Focus groups as qualitative research. Vol. 16. New York: SAGE, 1996
Google Scholar27. Fern, EF . The use of focus groups for idea generation: the effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. J Mark Res 1982; 19(1): 1–13.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI28. Guest, G, Namey, E, Taylor, J, et al. Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2017; 20(6): 693–708.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Heary, C, Hennessy, E. Focus groups versus individual interviews with children: a comparison of data. Irish J Psychol 2006; 27(1–2): 58–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref30. Smith, ED, Phillips, JM, Price, MM. Screening and early detection among racial and ethnic minority women. Semin Oncol Nurs 2001; 17(3): 159–170.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Katz, V . Children as brokers of their immigrant families’ health-care connections. Soc Probl 2014; 61(2): 194–215.
Google Scholar | Crossref32. Ajzen, I . The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50(2): 179–211.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI33. Tacken Braspenning, JC, Hermens, RP, Spreeuwenberg, PM, et al. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women’s beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization. Eur J Public Health 2007; 17(2): 178–185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Sheeran, P, Orbell, S. Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol 2000; 19(3): 283–289.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI35. Zhang, J, Sha, Z, Gu, Y, et al. Predicting behavioral intentions related to cervical cancer screening using a three-level model for the TPB and SCT in Nanjing, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16(19): 3575.
Google Scholar | Crossref36. Braun, V, Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77–101.
Google Scholar | Crossref37. Buitelaar, MW . Negotiating the rules of chaste behaviour: re-interpretations of the symbolic complex of virginity by young women of Moroccan descent in The Netherlands. Ethn Racial Stud 2002; 25(3): 462–489.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI38. Rebolj, M, van Ballegooijen, M, Berkers, L, et al. Monitoring a national cancer prevention program: successful changes in cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2007; 120(4): 806–812.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI39. Lofters, AK, Vahabi, M, Fardad, M, et al. Exploring the acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling among Muslim immigrant women. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9: 323–329.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Vahabi, M, Lofters, A. Muslim immigrant women’s views on cervical cancer screening and HPV self-sampling in Ontario, Canada. BMC Public Health 2016; 16(1): 1–13.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Marchena, E, Hamdiui, N, Stein, ML, et al. Reasons for cervical cancer screening participation among Turkish-and Moroccan-Dutch: focus groups. Eur J Public Health 2019; 29(Suppl. 4): ckz186–ckz375.
Google Scholar | Crossref42. Health Council of the Netherlands . Verbetermogelijkheden bevolkingsonderzoek Baarmoederhalskanker, 2021, https://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/documenten/adviezen/2021/10/19/verbetermogelijkheden-bevolkingsonderzoek-baarmoederhalskanker
Google Scholar43. Bosgraaf, RP, Ketelaars, PJW, Verhoef, VMJ, et al. Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch women. Prev Med 2014; 64: 108–113.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline44. Ketelaars, PJW, Bosgraaf, RP, Siebers, AG, et al. High-risk human papillomavirus detection in self-sampling compared to physician-taken smear in a responder population of the Dutch cervical screening: results of the VERA study. Prev Med 2017; 101: 96–101.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline45. Duffett-Leger, LA, Letourneau, NL, Croll, JC. Cervical cancer screening practices among university women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008; 37(5): 572–581.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI