1. Hughes, TM, Merath, K, Chen, Q, Sun, S, Palmer, E, Idrees, JJ, et al. Association of shared decision-making on patient-reported health outcomes and healthcare utilization. Am J Surg. 2018;216:7-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.011 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline2. Department of Health. Liberating the NHS: No decision about me without me [Report on Internet]. London; 2010. Available from:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216980/Liberating-the-NHS-No-decision-about-me-without-me-Government-response.pdf Google Scholar3. O’Connor, AM, Wennberg, JE, Legare, F, Llewellyn-Thomas, HA, Moulton, BW, Sepucha, KR, et al. Toward the ‘tipping point’: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff. 2007;26:716-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI4. Légaré, F, Witteman, HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff. 2013;32:276-84, doi:
10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1078 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI5. Barry, MJ, Edgman-Levitan, S, Sepucha, K. Shared decision-making: staying focused on the ultimate goal. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery. 2018;SEP 06, 2018(4).
Google Scholar6. Brown, SL, Salmon, P. Reconciling the theory and reality of shared decision–making: a “matching” approach to practitioner leadership. Health Expect. 2019;22:275-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12853 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline7. Blumenthal-Barby, J, Opel, DJ, Dickert, NW, Kramer, DB, Tucker Edmonds, B, Ladin, K, et al. Potential unintended consequences of recent shared decision making policy initiatives. Health Aff. 2019;38:1876-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline8. Légaré, F, Adekpedjou, R, Stacey, D, Turcotte, S, Kryworuchko, J, Graham, ID, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7).
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4 Google Scholar |
Medline9. Probst, MA, Kanzaria, HK, Frosch, DL, Hess, EP, Winkel, G, Ngai, KM, et al. Perceived appropriateness of shared decision–making in the emergency department: a survey study. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:375-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.12904 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline10. Canadian Medical Association . Appropriateness in Healthcare [Policy on the Internet]. Ottawa: 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 19]. Available from: https://policybase.cma.ca/documents/policypdf/PD15-05.pdf.
Google Scholar11. Elwyn, G, Frosch, D, Thomson, R, Joseph-Williams, N, Lloyd, A, Kinnersley, P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI12. Calcaterra, D, Di Modica, G, Tomarchio, O, Romeo, P. A clinical decision support system to increase appropriateness of diagnostic imaging prescriptions. J Netw Comput Appl. 2018;117(1 September 2018):17-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.05.011 Google Scholar |
Crossref13. Hunter, J, Franken, M, Balmer, D. Constructions of patient agency in healthcare settings: textual and patient perspectives. Discourse, Context & Media. 2015;7:37-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.01.002 Google Scholar |
Crossref14. Mulley, A, Trimble, C, Elwyn, G. Patients’ preferences matter. Stop Silent Misdiagnosis King’s Fund. 2012. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/patients-preferences-matter-may-2012.pdf
Google Scholar15. Jolles, MP, Richmond, J, Thomas, KC. Minority patient preferences, barriers, and facilitators for shared decision-making with health care providers in the USA: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102:1251-62, doi:
10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.003 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline16. Sanmartin, C, Murphy, K, Choptain, N, Conner-Spady, B, McLaren, L, Bohm, E, et al. Appropriateness of healthcare interventions: concepts and scoping of the published literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:342-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462308080458 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI17. Kuhl, E . Shared decision making aid increases patient knowledge, decreases rate of admission for low risk chest pain [Internet]. Washington, D.C. 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 19]. Available from:
https://smhs.gwu.edu/urgentmatters/news/shared-decision-making-aid-increases-patient-knowledge-decreases-rate-admission-low-risk-chest.
Google Scholar18. Canadian Institute for Health Information . Unnecessary Care in Canada. [Choosing Wisely Baseline Report on Internet]. Ottawa. The Institute; 2017 [cited 2020 Oct 19]Available from:
https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/choosing-wisely-baseline-report-en-web.pdf . Google Scholar19. Ward, P . Trust and communication in a doctor-patient relationship: a literature review. Arch Med. 2018;3:36.
Google Scholar20. Manhas, KP, Olson, K, Churchill, K, Vohra, S, Wasylak, T. Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1-2, doi:
10.1186/s12913-020-05223-4 Google Scholar |
Crossref21. Hofstede, SN, de Mheen PJ, M-v, Wentink, MM, Stiggelbout, AM, Vleggeert-Lankamp, CL, Vlieland, TP, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-95 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline22. Makoul, G, Clayman, ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Education & Counseling. 2006;60:301-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline |
ISI23. Wiljer, D, Urowitz, S, Apatu, E, DeLenardo, C, Eysenbach, G, Harth, T, et al. Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1061 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline24. Sulmasy, LS, López, AM, Horwitch, CA. American College of physicians ethics, professionalism and human rights committee. Ethical implications of the electronic health record: in the service of the patient. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:935-9, doi:
10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1 Google Scholar |
Crossref |
Medline
Comments (0)