1. Fishman, S. Education in prosthetics and orthotics. Prosthet Orthot Int 1977; 1: 52–55.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals2. World Health Organization . The international classification of functioning, disability and health, https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
Google Scholar3. Desmond, D, Layton, N, Bentley, J, et al. Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2018; 13: 437–444.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Smith, RO, Scherer, MJ, Cooper, R, et al. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2018; 13: 473–485.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Scherer, MJ. It is time for the biopsychosocialtech model. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2020; 15: 363–364.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. American Psychological Association Dictionary of Psychology , https://dictionary.apa.org/psychosocial (2020, accessed 23 September 2020).
Google Scholar7. United Nations . Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (Resolution 61/106). New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2007.
Google Scholar8. World Health Organization World Bank . World report on disability. Valletta: World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf (2011, accessed 31 July 2020).
Google Scholar9. World Health Organization . Assistive Technology Factsheets, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
Google Scholar10. MacLachlan, M, Mannan, H. The World report on disability and its implications for rehabilitation psychology. Rehabil Psychol 2014; 59: 117–124.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Bentley, JA, Bruyère, SM, LeBlanc, J, et al. Globalizing rehabilitation psychology: application of foundational principles to global health and rehabilitation challenges. Rehabil Psychol 2016; 61: 65–73.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Desmond, D, MacLachlan, M. Psychological issues in prosthetic and orthotic practice: a 25 year review of psychology in Prosthetics and Orthotics International. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26: 182–188.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI13. Gallagher, P, Desmond, D. Measuring quality of life in prosthetic practice: benefits and challenges. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31: 167–176.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI14. Hawkins, AT, Henry, AJ, Crandell, DM, et al. A systematic review of functional and quality of life assessment after major lower extremity amputation. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28: 763–780.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Heinemann, AW, Connelly, L, Ehrlich-Jones, L, et al. Outcome instruments for prosthetics: clinical applications. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2014; 25: 179–198.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Bettoni, E, Ferriero, G, Bakhsh, H, et al. A systematic review of questionnaires to assess patient satisfaction with limb orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2016; 40: 158–169.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI17. Melis-Schrijver, LM, den Hollander-Ardon, MS, Janssen, WG, et al. Gemstracker expertise team Rotterdam arm and hand: web-based monitoring of physical, social and emotional functioning in patients with upper limb amputations. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 50–55.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI18. Jarl, GM, Hermansson, LMN. Translation and linguistic validation of the Swedish version of orthotics and prosthetics users’ survey. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33: 329–338.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI19. Hafner, BJ, Spaulding, SE, Salem, R, et al. Prosthetists’ perceptions and use of outcome measures in clinical practice: long-term effects of focused continuing education. Prosthet Orthot Int 2017; 41: 266–273.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI20. COMET Initiative . Core outcome measures in effectiveness trials, http://www.comet-initiative.org/
Google Scholar21. Brehm, M, Bus, SA, Harlaar, J, et al. A candidate core set of outcome measures based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health for clinical studies on lower limb orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 269–277.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI22. Kohler, F, Cieza, A, Stucki, G, et al. Developing core sets for persons following amputation based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health as a way to specify functioning. Prosthet Orthot Int 2009; 33: 117–129.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI23. Xu, J, Kohler, F, Dickson, H. Systematic review of concepts measured in individuals with lower limb amputation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health as a reference. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 262–268.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI24. Liao, C, Seghers, F, Savage, M, et al. Product narrative: prostheses: a market landscape and strategic approach to increasing access to prosthetic devices and related services in low- and middle-income countries, AT2030, https://at2030.org/static/at2030_core/outputs/Prostheses_Product_Narrative_Final_20200728.pdf
Google Scholar25. Cairns, N, Corney, J, Murray, K, et al. Rethinking the foam cosmesis for people with lower limb absence. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 223–227.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI26. Highsmith, MJ, Kahle, JT, Knight, M, et al. Delivery of cosmetic covers to persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputations in an outpatient prosthetic practice. Prosthet Orthot Int 2016; 40: 343–349.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI27. Deans, S, Burns, D, McGarry, A, et al. Motivations and barriers to prosthesis users participation in physical activity, exercise and sport: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 260–269.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI28. Akarsu, S, Tekin, L, Safaz, I, et al. Quality of life and functionality after lower limb amputations: comparison between uni- vs. bilateral amputee patients. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37: 9–13.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI29. Topuz, S, Ülger, Ö, Yakut, Y, et al. Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the trinity amputation and prosthetic experience Scales (TAPES) in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 201–206.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI30. Pires, GKW, da Silva, FC, Luza, LP, et al. Semantic equivalence in Brazilian Portuguese translation of the trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales-revised. Prosthet Orthot Int 2020; 44: 66–72.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI31. Jefferies, P, Gallagher, P, Dunne, S. The paralympic athlete: a systematic review of the psychosocial literature. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 278–289.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI32. Donovan-Hall, MK, Yardley, L, Watts, RJ. Engagement in activities revealing the body and psychosocial adjustment in adults with a trans-tibial prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26: 15–22.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI33. Bent, N, Tennant, A, Neumann, V, et al. Living with thalidomide: health status and quality of life at 40 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31: 147–156.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI34. Amorelli, C, Yancosek, K, Morris, R. Amputees unanimous: a 12-step program. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019; 43: 293–300.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI35. Sinha, R, van den Heuvel, WJ, Arokiasamy, P. Adjustments to amputation and an artificial limb in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2014; 38: 115–121.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI36. Desmond, D, Gallagher, P, Henderson-Slater, D, et al. Pain and psychosocial adjustment to lower limb amputation amongst prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008; 32: 244–252.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI37. Li, WS, Chan, SY, Chau, WW, et al. Mobility, prosthesis use and health-related quality of life of bilateral lower limb amputees from the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019; 43: 104–111.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI38. Callaghan, B, Condie, E, Johnston, M. Using the common sense self-regulation model to determine psychological predictors of prosthetic use and activity limitations in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008; 32: 324–336.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI39. Washington, ED, Williams, AE. An exploratory phenomenological study exploring the experiences of people with systemic disease who have undergone lower limb amputation and its impact on their psychological well-being. Prosthet Orthot Int 2016; 40: 44–50.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals40. Smith, J, Osborn, M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In:Smith, JA (ed.) Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to methods. London: SAGE, 2008, pp. 53–80.
Google Scholar41. Michielsen, A, Van Wijk, I, Ketelaar, M. Participation and quality of life in children and adolescents with congenital limb deficiencies: a narrative review. Prosthet Orthot Int 2010; 34: 351–361.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI42. Williams, AE, Nester, CJ. Patient perceptions of stock footwear design features. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30: 61–71.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI43. Cairns, N, Murray, K, Corney, J, et al. Satisfaction with cosmesis and priorities for cosmesis design reported by lower limb amputees in the United Kingdom: instrument development and results. Prosthet Orthot Int 2014; 38: 467–473.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI44. Anderson, S, Chaffey, L, Dillon, M. ‘It’s. .. Forward-focused’: experiences of a mobility clinic for people with limb loss. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019; 43: 601–608.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals45. Ide, M, Watanabe, T, Toyonaga, T. Sexuality in persons with limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002; 26: 189–194.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI46. Areskoug-Josefsson, K, Thidell, F, Rolander, B, et al. Prosthetic and orthotic students’ attitudes toward addressing sexual health in their future profession. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 612–619.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals47. Lundberg, M, Hagberg, K, Bullington, J. My prosthesis as a part of me: a qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 207–214.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI48. Quigley, M, Dillon, MP, Fatone, S. Development of shared decision-making resources to help inform difficult healthcare decisions: an example focused on dysvascular partial foot and transtibial amputations. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 378–386.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI49. van Netten, JJ, Francis, A, Morphet, A, et al. Communication techniques for improved acceptance and adherence with therapeutic footwear. Prosthet Orthot Int 2017; 41: 201–204.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI50. Anderson, S, Stuckey, R, Oakman, JR. Prosthetists’ and Orthotists’ experience of their work and workspace – characterising the physical and organisational environment: focus group findings. Prosthet Orthot Int 2016; 40: 703–712.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI51. Grobler, I, Van Schalkwyk, GJ, Wagner, C. The application of critical psychology to facilitate reflective clinical practice in orthotics/prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30: 237–245.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI52. Scherer, MJ. Rehabilitation psychology. In:Weiner, IB, Craighead, WE (eds) The corsini encyclopedia of psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.
Google Scholar | Crossref53. Donovan-Hall, MK, Chadwell, A, Zuleima, DMR, et al. Harnessing public and patient involvement for upper limb prosthetics design. In: Trent international prosthetics symposium, Salford, . London: University College London.
Google Scholar