1. Stacey, D, Volk, RJ, Leads, IEU. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: evidence update 2.0. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:729–33.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals2. Bonner, C, Trevena, LJ, Gaissmaier, W, et al. Current best practice for presenting probabilities in patient decision aids: fundamental principles. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:821–33.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals3. Hoffmann, TC, Bakhit, M, Durand, MA, Perestelo-Perez, L, Saunders, C, Brito, JP. Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: an update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:755–67.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals4. Joseph-Williams, N, Abhyankar, P, Boland, L, et al. What works in implementing patient decision aids in routine clinical settings? A rapid realist review and update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:907–37.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals5. Martin, RW, Brogard Andersen, S, O’Brien, MA, et al. Providing balanced information about options in patient decision aids: an update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:780–800.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI6. Muscat, DM, Smith, J, Mac, O, et al. Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids: an update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:848–69.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals7. Rahn, AC, Jull, J, Boland, L, et al. Guidance and/or decision coaching with patient decision aids: scoping reviews to inform the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Med Decis Making. 2021;41:938–53.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals8. Shaffer, VA, Brodney, S, Gavaruzzi, T, et al. Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? An update from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:897–906.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals9. Thompson, R, Paskins, Z, Main, BG, et al. Addressing conflicts of interest in health and medicine: current evidence and implications for patient decision aid development. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:768–79.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals10. Trenaman, L, Jansen, J, Blumenthal-Barby, J, et al. Are we improving? Update and critical appraisal of the reporting of decision process and quality measures in trials evaluating patient decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:954–9.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals11. Trevena, LJ, Bonner, C, Okan, Y, et al. Current challenges when using numbers in patient decision aids: advanced concepts. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:834–47.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals12. Witteman, HO, Maki, KG, Vaisson, G, et al. Systematic development of patient decision aids: an update from the IPDAS Collaboration. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:736–54.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals13. Witteman, HO, Ndjaboue, R, Vaisson, G, et al. Clarifying values: an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2021;41:801–20.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals14. Yen, RW, Smith, J, Engel, J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient decision aids for socially disadvantaged populations: update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Med Decis Making. 2021;41:870–96.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals15. Qaseem, A, Forland, F, Macbeth, F, et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:525–31.
Google Scholar | Crossref16. LeLorier, J, Gregoire, G, Benhaddad, A, Lapierre, J, Derderian, F. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:536–42.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Ioannidis, JP, Haidich, AB, Pappa, M, et al. Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies. JAMA. 2001;286:821–30.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Sepucha, KR, Scholl, I. Measuring shared decision making: a review of constructs, measures, and opportunities for cardiovascular care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7:620–6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Owens, DK, Lohr, KN, Atkins, D, et al. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:513–23.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Sawaya, GF, Guirguis-Blake, J, LeFevre, M, Harris, R, Petitti, D; on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Update on the methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: estimating certainty and magnitude of net benefit. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:871–5.
Google Scholar | Crossref