Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review

Alfuriji, S, Alhazmi, N, Alhamlan, N, Al-Ehaideb, A, Alruwaithi, M, Alkatheeri, N, et al. (2014) The effect of orthodontic therapy on periodontal health: a review of the literature. International Journal of Dentistry 2014: 585048.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Arora, N, Mishra, A, Chugh, S (2014) Microbial role in periodontitis: have we reached the top? Some unsung bacteria other than red complex. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 18: 9–13.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Atack, NE, Sandy, JR, Addy, M (1996) Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. Journal of Periodontology 67: 78–85.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Baka, ZM, Basciftci, FA, Arslan, U (2013) Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: a quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 144: 260–267.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Benn, A, Heng, N, Broadbent, JM, Thomson, WM (2018) Studying the human oral microbiome: challenges and the evolution of solutions. Australian Dental Journal 63: 14–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bergamo, AZN, Nelson-Filho, P, Andrucioli, MCD, do Nascimento, C, Pedrazzi, Matsumoto, MAN (2017) Microbial complexes levels in conventional and self-ligating brackets. Clinical Oral Investigations 21: 1037–1046.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bergamo, AZN, Matsumoto, MAN, Nascimento, CD, Andrucioli, MCD, Romano, FL, Silva, RAB, et al. (2019) Microbial species associated with dental caries found in saliva and in situ after use of self-ligating and conventional brackets. Journal of Applied Oral Science 27: e20180426.
Google Scholar | Crossref Borenstein, M, Hedges, V, Higgins, J, Rothstein, HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: J Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Google Scholar | Crossref Boyd, RL, Baumrind, S (1992) Periodontal considerations in the use of bonds or bands on molars in adolescents and adults. Angle Orthodontist 62: 117–126.
Google Scholar | Medline British Orthodontic Society (2021a) Why Orthodontics? Available at: https://www.bos.org.uk/BOS-Homepage/Orthodontics-for-Children-Teens/Why-Orthodontics (accessed 12 May 2021).
Google Scholar British Orthodontic Society (2021b) The Zoom Boom BOS stats reveal a surge in demand for orthodontics during the pandemic. Available at: https://www.bos.org.uk/News-and-Events/News (accessed 12 May 2021).
Google Scholar Buck, T, Pellegrini, P, Sauerwein, R, Leo, MC, Covell, DA, Maier, T, et al. (2011) Elastomeric-ligated vs self-ligating appliances: a pilot study examining microbial colonization and white spot lesion formation after 1 year of orthodontic treatment. Orthodontics: The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement 12: 108–121.
Google Scholar | Medline Cardoso, MA, Saraiva, PP, Maltagliati, LA, Rhoden, FK, Costa, CCA, Normando, D, et al. (2015) Alterations in plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation promoted by treatment with self-ligating and conventional orthodontic brackets. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 20: 35–41.
Google Scholar | Crossref Chibber, A, Agarwal, S, Yadav, S, Kuo, CL, Upadhyay, M (2018) Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? a randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 153: 175–183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018) CASP (Randomised Controlled Trial) Checklist. Available at: casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/CASP-Randomised-Controlled-Trial-Checklist-2018.pdf (accessed 5 February 2021).
Google Scholar Crosse, A (2014) An orthodontic needs assessment and service review for east Anglia. Anglia and Essex Centre: Public Health England. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/east-of-england/wp-content/uploads/sites/47/2019/05/Orthodontic-Needs-Assessment-East-Anglia-2018-1.pdf (accessed 4 February 2021).
Google Scholar Damon, D (1998) The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clinical Orthodontics and Research 1: 52–61.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Dewhirst, FE, Chen, T, Izard, J, Paster, BJ, Tanner, ACR, Yu, WH, et al. (2010) The human oral microbiome. Journal of Bacteriology 192: 5002–5017.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline do Nascimento, LEAG, de Souza, MMG, Azevedo, ARP, Maia, LC (2014) Are self-ligating brackets related to less formation of Streptococcus mutans colonies? A systematic review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 19: 60–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Elkordy, SA, Palomo, L, Palomo, JM, Mostafa, YA (2019) Do fixed orthodontic appliances adversely affect the periodontium? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Seminars in Orthodontics 25: 130–157.
Google Scholar | Crossref Folco, AA, Benitez-Roge, SC, Iglesias, M, Calabrese, D, Pelizardi, C, Rosa, A, et al. (2014) Gingival response in orthodontic patients: comparative study between self-ligating and conventional brackets. Acta Odontologica Latinoamericana 27: 120–124.
Google Scholar | Medline Gorelick, L, Geiger, AM, Gwinnett, AJ (1982) Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 93–98.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Harradine, NWT (2003) Self-ligating brackets: Where are we now? Journal of Orthodontics 30: 262–273.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Higgins, JPT, Green, S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://www.cochranehandbook.org. (accessed 4 February 2021).
Google Scholar Ireland, AJ, Soro, V, Sprague, SV, Harradine, NWT, Day, C, Al-Anezi, S, et al. (2014) The effects of different orthodontic appliances upon microbial communities. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 17: 115–123.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Irving, M, Eramudugolla, R, Cherbuin, N, Anstey, KJ (2017) A Critical Review of Grading Systems: Implications for Public Health Policy. Evaluation & the Health Professions 40: 244–262
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Jiang, Q, Li, J, Mei, L, Du, J, Levrini, L, Abbate, GM, et al. (2018) Periodontal health during orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Dental Association 149: 712–720.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kaygisiz, E, Uzuner, FD, Yuksel, S, Taner, L, Culhaoglu, R, Sezgin, Y, et al. (2015) Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions. Angle Orthodontist 85: 468–473.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kendall, JM (2003) Designing a research project: randomised controlled trials and their principles. Journal of Emergency Medicine 20: 164–168.
Google Scholar | Crossref Krupińska-Nanys, M, Zarzecka, J (2015) An assessment of oral hygiene in 7-14-year-old children undergoing orthodontic treatment. Journal of International Oral Health 7: 6–11.
Google Scholar | Medline Lavrakas, PJ (2008) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar | Crossref Longoni, J, Lopes, BM, Freires, IA, Dutra, KL, Franco, A, Paranhos, LR (2017) Self-ligating versus conventional metallic brackets on Streptococcus mutans retention: a systematic review. European Journal of Dentistry 11: 537–547.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal 339: b2535.
Google Scholar | Crossref Mulder, R, Singh, AB, Hamilton, A, Das, P, Outhred, T, Morris, G, et al. (2018) The limitations of using randomised controlled trials as a basis for developing treatment guidelines. Evidence-Based Mental Health 21: 4–6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Mummolo, S, Marchetti, E, Giuca, MR, Gallusi, G, Tecco, S, Gatto, R, et al. (2013) In-office bacteria test for a microbial monitoring during the conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. Head and Face Medicine 9: 7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Murad, MH, Asi, N, Alsawas, M, Alahdab, F (2016) New evidence pyramid. Evidence Based Medicine 21: 125–127.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Nalcaci, R, Ozat, Y, Cokakoglu, S, Turkkahraman, H, Onal, S, Kaya, S (2014) Effect of bracket type on halitosis, periodontal status, and microbial colonization. Angle Orthodontist 84: 479–485.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Pandis, N, Papaioannou, W, Kontou, E, Nakou, M, Makou, M, Eliades, T (2010) Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. European Journal of Orthodontics 32: 94–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref Pejda, S, Varga, ML, Milosevic, SA, Mestrovic, S, Slaj, M, Repic, D, et al. (2013) Clinical and microbiological parameters in patients with self-ligating and conventional brackets during early phase of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthodontist 83: 133–139.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Pellegrini, P, Sauerwein, R, Finlayson, T, McLeod, J, Covell, DA, Maier, T, et al. (2009) Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 135: 426–427.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Philip, N, Suneja, B, Walsh, L (2018) Beyond Streptococcus mutans: clinical implications of the evolving dental caries aetiological paradigms and its associated microbiome. British Dental Journal 224: 219–225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Pithon, MM, Santos, RL, Nascimento, LE, Ayres, AO, Alviano, D, Bolognese, AM (2011) Do self-ligating brackets favour greater bacterial aggregation? Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences 10: 208–212.
Google Scholar Ristic, M, Vlahovic, SM, Sasic, M, Zelic, O (2007) Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 10: 187–195.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Spieth, PM, Kubasch, AS, Penzlin, AL, Illigens, BMW, Barlinn, K, Siepmann, T (2016) Randomised controlled trials - a matter of design. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 12: 1341–1349.
Google Scholar | Medline Sterne, JAC, Savovic, J, Page, MJ, Elbers, RG, Blencowe, NS, Boutron, I, et al. (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal 366: l4898.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Tufekci, E, Dixon, JS, Gunsolley, JC, Lindauer, SJ (2011) Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthodontist 81: 206–210.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Türkkahraman, H, Sayin, MO, Bozkurt, FY, Yetkin, Z, Kaya, S, Onal, S (2005) Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthodontist 75: 231–236.
Google Scholar | Medline Uzuner, FD, Kaygisiz, E, Cankaya, ZT (2014) Effect of the bracket types on microbial colonization and periodontal status. Angle Orthodontist 84: 1062–1067.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline van Gastel, J, Quirynen, M, Teughels, W, Coucke, C, Carels, C (2011) Longitudinal changes in microbiology and clinical periodontal parameters after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances. European Journal of Orthodontics 33: 15–21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Van Gastel, J, Quirynen, M, Teughels, W, Pauwels, M, Coucke, W, Carels, C (2009) Microbial adhesion on different bracket types in vitro. Angle Orthodontist 79: 915–921.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Wiedel, AP, Bondemark, L (2015) Fixed versus removable orthodontic appliances to correct anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition—a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthodontics 37: 123–127.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Yang, X, Su, N, Shi, Z, Xiang, Z, He, Y, Han, X, et al. (2017) Effects of self-ligating brackets on oral hygiene and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. International Journal of Dental Hygiene 15: 16–22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

Comments (0)

No login
gif