Maternal and fetal characteristics to predict c-section delivery: A scoring system for pregnant women

1. Teguete, I, Maiga, AW, Leppert, PC. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of grand multiparas over two decades in Mali. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91(5): 580–586.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Gedefaw, G, Demis, A, Alemnew, B, et al. Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg 2020; 14: 11–10.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization . WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
Google Scholar4. Ye, J, Zhang, J, Mikolajczyk, R, et al. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG 2016; 123(5): 745–753.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Betran, AP, Torloni, MR, Zhang, J, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health 2015; 12(1): 57.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. World Health Organization . Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
Google Scholar7. Chien, P. Global rising rates of caesarean sections. BJOG 2021; 128(5): 781–782.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Begum, T, Saif-Ur-Rahman, KM, Yaqoot, F, et al. Global incidence of caesarean deliveries on maternal request: a systematic review and meta-regression. BJOG 2021; 128(5): 798–806.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia . Laporan Nasional Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementeri Kesehat RI, 2018, pp. 1–582.
Google Scholar10. Keag, OE, Norman, JE, Stock, SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2018; 15(1): e1002494.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Putri, RA, Dilmy, MAF, Purwosunu, Y, et al. Surgical management outcome of placenta accreta spectrum at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital (2017-2019). In: Annual Scientific Meeting of Indonesian Maternal Fetal Medicine Association. Surabaya, 13–8 march 2020.
Google Scholar12. Souza, J, Gülmezoglu, A, Lumbiganon, P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med 2010; 8(1): 71.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Mahmood, MA, Hendarto, H, Laksana, MAC, et al. Health system and quality of care factors contributing to maternal deaths in East Java, Indonesia. PLoS ONE 2021; 16(2): e0247911.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Guan, P, Tang, F, Sun, G, et al. Prediction of emergency cesarean section by measurable maternal and fetal characteristics. J Investig Med 2020; 68(3): 799–806.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Rossi, RM, Requarth, E, Warshak, CR, et al. Risk calculator to predict cesarean delivery among women undergoing induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135(3): 559–568.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Sastroasmoro, S, Ismael, S. Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis. Jakarta, Indonesia: Sagung Seto, 2011.
Google Scholar17. Hypertension in pregnancy . Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(5): 1122–1131.
Google Scholar | Medline18. Riddle, MC. Standards of medical care in diabetes: response to position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2020; 43(1): 476.
Google Scholar | Medline19. Figueras, F, Gratacós, E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 36(2): 86–98.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Teshome, AA, Li, Q, Garoma, W, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain predicts fetal growth and neonatal outcomes. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2021; 42: 307–312.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Zhao, RF, Zhang, WY, Zhou, L. Relationship between the risk of emergency cesarean section for nullipara with the prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2017; 52(11): 757–764.
Google Scholar | Medline22. Vilar Sánchez, Á, Fernández Alba, JJ, González Macías, MDC, et al. Maternal underweight and perinatal outcomes: a restrospective cohort study. Nutr Hosp 2017; 34(3): 647–653.
Google Scholar | Medline23. Papoutsis, D, Antonakou, A, Gornall, A, et al. The SaTH risk-assessment tool for the prediction of emergency cesarean section in women having induction of labor for all indications: a large-cohort based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295(1): 59–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Janoudi, G, Kelly, S, Yasseen, A, et al. Factors associated with increased rates of caesarean section in women of advanced maternal age. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37(6): 517–526.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Mohsin, FF, Skaeer, IH, Mohammed Ali, HK. Inter-delivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery in Babylon maternity and pediatric hospital. Int J Contemp Med Res 2019; 6(3): C16–C21.
Google Scholar26. Huang, WH, Nakashima, DK, Rumney, PJ, et al. Interdelivery interval and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99(1): 41–44.
Google Scholar | Medline27. Mylonas, I, Friese, K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112(29–30): 489–495.
Google Scholar | Medline28. Kotha, S, Kushtagi, P, Radhakrishnan, K. Prediction of mode of delivery in term pregnancies: development of scoring system. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2015; 4(5): 1283–1290.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Cheyney, M, Burcher, P, Vedam, S. A crusade against home birth. Birth 2014; 41(1): 1–4.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Froehlich, RJ, Sandoval, G, Bailit, JL, et al. Association of recorded estimated fetal weight and cesarean delivery in attempted vaginal delivery at term. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128(3): 487–494.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Eze, CU, Abonyi, LC, Njoku, J, et al. Correlation of ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2015; 15(4): 1112–1122.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Stephens, K, Al-Memar, M, Beattie-Jones, S, et al. Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98(11): 1435–1441.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Nicholson, JM. Non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy. BMJ 2006; 333(7568): 562–563.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

Comments (0)

No login
gif