1. Smith, LF . The effects of confidence and perception of test-taking skill on performance. N Am J Psychol 2002; 4: 37–50.
Google Scholar2. Kellaghan, T, Madaus, GF, Raczek, A. The use of external examinations to improve student motivation. Washington, DC: The American Educational Research Association, 1996, p. 71.
Google Scholar3. MacIver, DJ, Stipek, DJ, Daniels, DH. Explaining within-semester changes in student effort in junior high school and senior high school courses. J Educ Psychol 1991; 83: 201–211.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI4. Morris, CC . Retrieval processes underlying confidence in comprehension judgments. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990; 16: 223–232.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI5. McClimens, A, Ibbotson, R, Kenyon, C, et.al. Confidence and performance in objective structured clinical examination. Br J Midwifery 2012; 20: 746–751.
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Crisp, G, Cruz, I. Mentoring college students: a critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Res High Educ 2009; 50: 525–545.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI7. Struthers, CW, Perry, RP, Menec, VH. An examination of the relationship among academic stress, coping, motivation, and performance in college. Res High Educ 2000; 41: 581–592
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI8. Putwain, D . Examination stress and test anxiety. Psychologist 2008; 21: 1026–1029.
Google Scholar9. Singh, S . Near peer role modeling: the fledgling scholars’ education paradigm. Anat Sci Educ 2010; 3: 50–51.
Google Scholar | Medline10. Lockspeiser, TM, O’Sullivan, P, Teherani, A, et al. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008; 13:361–372.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. Ramani, S, Mann, K, Taylor, D, et.al. Residents as teachers: near peer learning in clinical work settings: AMEE guide no. 106. Med Teach 2016; 38: 642–655.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Ross, MT, Cameron, HS. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE guide no. 30. Med Teach 2007;29: 527–545.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Rodrigues, J, Sengupta, A, Mitchell, A, et al. The Southeast Scotland foundation doctor teaching programme—is ‘‘near-peer’’ teaching feasible, efficacious and sustainable on a regional scale? Med Teach 2009; 31: e51–e57.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI14. Gallien, T, Oomen-Early, J. Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online courseroom: does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor? Int J E-learn 2008; 7: 463–476.
Google Scholar15. Perera, J, Lee, N, Win, K, et al. Formative feedback to students: the mismatch between faculty perceptions and student expectations. Med Teach 2008; 30: 395–399.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Meo, SA . Basic steps in establishing effective small group teaching sessions in medical schools. Pak J Med Sci 2013; 29: 1071–1076.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Edmunds, S, Brown, G. Effective small group learning: AMEE guide no. 48. Med Teach 2010. 32:715–726
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline