Identification of new ethanol‐tolerant yeast strains with fermentation potential from central Patagonia

Supplementary Table 1. List of isolates employed in this study.

Supplementary Table 2. Growth media utilized in this study and their composition in semi-solid and 96-well plate phenotyping assays. *liquid media for 96-well plate phenotyping assay.

Supplementary Table 3. Hypergeometric test results.

Supplementary Table 4. Coefficient of variation test results. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between strains with a p-value < 0.05, one-way ANOVA.

Supplementary Table 5. Selected strains for fermentation experiments.

Supplementary Table 6. Total CO2 loss, residual wort sugars, ethanol and glycerol production in fermentation experiments. CO2 loss, g/L ± SD; average sugars, g/L ± SD; average ethanol, % ± SD; average glycerol, g/L ± SD. n=3, n.d = sugar not detected. Different letters per column and fermented wort indicate statistically significant differences between strains with a p-value < 0.05, one-way ANOVA.

Supplementary Table 7. Tukey's multiple comparisons between S. eubayanus and S. uvarum in beer wort at 12° and 20°C.

Supplementary Table 8. Total CO2 loss, residual wort sugars, acids, ethanol and glycerol production of different mead composition. CO2 loss, g/L ± SD; average sugars, g/L ± SD; average ethanol, % ± SD; average glycerol, g/L ± SD. n=3, n.d = not detected. Different letters per column depict statistically significant differences between strains with a p-value < 0.05, one-way ANOVA.

Supplementary Table 9. YAN consumption under mead fermentation condition.

Comments (0)

No login
gif