What is clear from the WHO’s range of interventions is their irrefutable role in nearly all aspects of the response to the pandemic (WHO 2020). If the WHO did not exist, we would inevitably have to create a body to pick up functions of global health governance. Therefore, the WHO should provide a comprehensive account of any threat to population health and to healthcare systems as well as provide contextual solutions when new evidence emerges. It is also clear that countries with particularly weak public health systems do look to the WHO for expertise and resources to support their responses. The WHO also plays a major role worldwide in addressing problems of non-communicable disease.

The WHO is not mandated to make decisions on behalf of its Member States. Rather, it is up to Member States themselves to formulate policies that are applicable and relevant to them. We have seen multiple instances of denial, reckless actions, and attempts to malign the WHO, stemming from a country’s own inabilities, narrow political considerations, and short-term focus on the market economy, rather than on human lives and suffering. Moreover, the WHO’s policy is fundamentally and essentially determined by its Member States themselves through the governing bodies that run the Organization.

As with any major health incident, after the dust settles, an inquiry or appraisal will be required to assess the actions taken and lessons to be learnt from them. The World Health Assembly has resolved to have an independent inquiry into the global response to the coronavirus pandemic (BBC News 2020). Pandemics have proven to be regularly occurring and inescapable phenomena over the course of human history. The twenty-first-century way of life renders pandemics more possible through the complex interactions of human and animal ecology as well as human social and economic activity. The existence of an international organization like the WHO does not eliminate the possibility of a pandemic, but it is a safeguard to protect lives. The WHO is the best chance we have to prepare for, respond to, and recover from future outbreaks and pandemics. As such, we need it to persist now, and during future outbreaks and pandemics more than ever. It is essential, however, that an inquiry is full, transparent, and honest. We as representatives of schools and programs of public health will comment critically, fully analyzing actions taken to ensure that mistakes are rectified and lessons are learned, for the future protection and improvement of health.

The Global Network for Academic Public Health (Global Network) is a convening body for academic public health leaders from around the world to share, learn, collaborate, to improve, and protect the health of the public and planet.

We call on governments to commit to a new era of openness, information sharing and mutual support, to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and future threats to the health of the world. We urge them to make a renewed commitment to global health governance.

We call on governments to maintain financial and material support to the WHO during and following the pandemic.

The Global Network calls on regional and national associations, societies, and schools of public health worldwide to continue to mobilize academic support in the fight against COVID-19, in collaboration with WHO offices across the globe.

We call for solidarity across, within, and between continents, countries, associations, and schools of public health in support of the WHO. We call on donors to provide funding which is less bound to specific projects, so it can be used more flexibly by the WHO.

The Global Network is committed to stand in solidarity with, reinforce, and coordinate the efforts of our members and member associations of public health worldwide as well as to provide evidence and make expertise available for the independent inquiry as requested by the WHO.