LETTERS TO EDITOR Year : 2021  |  Volume : 65  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 554-556  

Impact of aerosol box on anxiety of the anaesthesiologist for intubation during COVID-19 pandemic: A single-blinded observational study

Rishi Katiyar, Sarika Katiyar, Gaurav Acharya, Anurag Yadava
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Bhopal Memorial Hospital and Research Center, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Submission03-Apr-2021Date of Decision02-Jul-2021Date of Acceptance12-Jul-2021Date of Web Publication23-Jul-2021

Correspondence Address:
Sarika Katiyar
A-12, BMHRC Campus, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh
India

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Check

DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_282_21

How to cite this article:
Katiyar R, Katiyar S, Acharya G, Yadava A. Impact of aerosol box on anxiety of the anaesthesiologist for intubation during COVID-19 pandemic: A single-blinded observational study. Indian J Anaesth 2021;65:554-6
How to cite this URL:
Katiyar R, Katiyar S, Acharya G, Yadava A. Impact of aerosol box on anxiety of the anaesthesiologist for intubation during COVID-19 pandemic: A single-blinded observational study. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 23];65:554-6. Available from: https://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2021/65/7/554/322183

Sir,

Reports of healthcare workers (HCWs) getting infected during the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic are disturbing and tragic. The risk posed to HCWs especially anaesthesiologists during aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) is critical. Innovation of the aerosol box (AB) (made of acrylic or transparent polycarbonate sheet) may help to address this issue.[1] AB is a transparent plastic cube designed to cover a patient's head and has two circular ports through which the clinician's hands are passed to perform the airway procedure. It is a barrier device useful as an anti-splash or against direct cough from patient into the face of the proceduralist.[2] We conducted a survey from July 2020 to December 2020 to evaluate whether the AB really played a vital role in allaying anxiety of the anaesthesiologist regarding the risk of direct aerosol exposure or was it a hurdle in smooth working. The survey was distributed to experienced anaesthesiologists, who were routinely doing cases in general anaesthesia. After prior consent, we distributed the online survey to anaesthesiologists through their institutional emails, social media and WhatsApp messenger in our city. No data which could breech personal information was collected. They filled the questionnaire which enquired about their awareness, experiences, adventures and misadventures during induction and extubation with the AB [Table 1].

Ninety anaesthesiologists responded to the survey questions. Only 29.60% of the participants had prior experience with the AB [Table 2]. Almost 70.40% of the study population was unaware of the use of this innovative barrier device. 46.30% participants came to know about AB from colleagues, whereas the rest came to know from social media and other sources. Thus, the results depicted that no first-hand experience or hands-on training for anaesthesiologists was present prior to using this box. 11.10% of the participants had an overall nice experience with use of AB while performing intubation and 85.20% felt that though it was helpful, it was a hurdle for intubation. 3.70% of the participants found it to be hazardous. Bag and mask ventilation was found to be easy by 14.80%, while 57.40% found bag and mask ventilation difficult with use of the box [Table 2]. Ease with endotracheal intubation was reported by 9.30%, while 83.30% of the participants faced difficulty. The majority (70.40%) of the participants agreed that AB prevented contamination with aerosol particles, whereas 13% disagreed about the efficacy. Use of AB made 68.50% of the participants mentally composed, while the rest were anxious. 7.40% of the participants felt that nothing can affect the composure of an anaesthesiologist. 55.60% of the respondents were more comfortable working with level 3 personal protective equipment (PPE) without AB. Almost 72.2% of the participants agreed to recommend AB to other colleagues for AGPs. During extubation, 37.0% of the participants were under-confident in use of the box, while 18.5% of the participants felt that it did not affect their psychology during extubation.

Overall experience of the anaesthesiologists as per our survey was that the box acts as a hurdle for intubation and made bag and mask ventilation and intubation difficult. However, 70% of the study population felt that it prevented contamination with aerosol during AGPs, which was in compliance with the study conducted by Dalli et al.[3] This was in contrast to the study by Wakabayashi et al.,[4] who concluded that the effect of AB on endotracheal intubation difficulty is clinically irrelevant when an experienced anaesthesiologist intubates the trachea in normal airway conditions. The survey was inconclusive with regards to the confidence of the anaesthesiologist during extubation as per the meta-analysis by Sorbello et al.[5] The survey could also not conclude on the comfort with the use of the box as compared to level 3 PPE and was lacking in views on chances of accidental extubation and the box acting as an oxygen and virus reservoir.[6]

We concluded from the survey that though the AB allays the anxiety of the anaesthesiologist, it acts as a hurdle for intubation during AGPs.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr Saifullah Tipu for his help in conducting the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

   References 
1.Malhotra N, Joshi M, Datta R, Bajwa SJ, Mehdiratta L. Indian society of anaesthesiologists (ISA National) advisory and position statement regarding COVID-19. Indian J Anaesth 2020;64:259-63.  
  [Full text]  2.Canelli R, Connor CW, Gonzalez M, Nozari A, Ortega R. Barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1957-8.  
    3.Dalli J, Khan MF, Marsh B, Nolan K, Cahill RA. Evaluating intubation boxes for airway management. Br J Anaesth 2020;125:e293-5.  
    4.Wakabayashi R, Ishida T, Yamada T, Kawamata M. Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty. JAnaesth 2020;34:790-3.  
    5.Sorbello M, Rosenblatt W, Hofmeyr R, Greif R, Urdaneta F. Aerosol boxes and barrier enclosures for airway management in COVID-19 patients: A scoping review and narrativesynthesis.Br J Anaesth2020;125:880-94.  
    6.Vijayraghavan S, Puthenvettil N.Aerosol box for protection during airway manipulation in covid-19 patients. Indian J Anaesthesia 2020;64:S148-9.  
    

 
 

  [Table 1], [Table 2]