Bhattacharyya T. Chang D. Meigs J.B. Estok 2nd, D.M. Malchau H.

Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 2658-2662https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01538Young S.W. Walker C.G. Pitto R.P.

Functional outcome of femoral peri prosthetic fracture and revision hip arthroplasty: a matched-pair study from the New Zealand Registry.

Acta Orthop. 2008; 79: 483-488https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710015463Phillips J.R.A. Boulton C. Morac C.G. Manktelov A.R.J.

What is the financial cost of treating periprosthetic hip fractures?.

Injury. 2011; 42: 146-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.06.003Gitajn I.L. Heng M. Weaver M.J. Casemyr N. May C. Vrahas M.S. et al.

Mortality Following Surgical Management of Vancouver B Periprosthetic Fractures.

J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: 9-14https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000711Carli A.V. Negus J.J. Haddad F.S.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?.

Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B (9): 50https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1Singh J.A. Jensen M.R. Harmsen S.W. Lewallen D.G.

Are gender, comorbidity, and obesity risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty?.

J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28: 122-126https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.010

National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, 2020. https://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports-Publications-and-Minutes (date last accessed 7 October 2020). n.d.

Jämsen E. Eskelinen A. Peltola M. Mäkelä K.

High Early Failure Rate After Cementless Hip Replacement in the Octogenarian.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 2779-2789https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3641-7Lindahl H. Malchau H. Herberts P. Garellick G.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 857-865https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.001Sarvilinna R. Huhtala H. Pajamäki J.

Young age and wedge stem design are risk factors for periprosthetic fracture after arthroplasty due to hip fracture. A case-control study.

Acta Orthop. 2005; 76: 56-60https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470510030328Thien T.M. Chatziagorou G. Garellick G. Furnes O. Havelin L.I. Makela K. et al.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture within two years after total hip replacement: analysis of 437,629 operations in the nordic arthroplasty register association database.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: e167https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00643Mukka S. Mellner C. Knutsson B. Sayed-Noor A. Skoldenberg O.

Substantially higher prevalence of postoperative peri-prosthetic fractures in octogenarians with hip fractures operated with a cemented, polished tapered stem rather than an anatomic stem.

Acta Orthop. 2016; 87: 257-261https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1162898Palan J. Smith M.C. Gregg P. Mellon S. Kulkarni A. Tucker K. et al.

The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data.

Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B (54): 1347https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36534Kristensen T.B. Dybvik E. Furnes O. Engesæter L.B. Gjertsen J.-E.

More reoperations for periprosthetic fracture after cemented hemiarthroplasty with polished taper-slip stems than after anatomical and straight stems in the treatment of hip fractures: a study from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2005 to 2016.

Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B (71): 1565https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B12.BJJ-2018-0262.R1Scott T. Salvatore A. Woo P. Lee Y.-Y. Salvati E.A. Polished Gonzalez Della Valle A. Collarless Tapered

Cemented Stems for Primary Hip Arthroplasty May Exhibit High Rate of Periprosthetic Fracture at Short-Term Follow-Up.

J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 1120-1125https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.003

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 2020. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020 (date last accessed 7 October 2020). n.d.

Junnila M. Laaksonen I. Eskelinen A. Pulkkinen P. Ivar Havelin L. Furnes O. et al.

Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database.

Acta Orthop. 2016; 87: 546-553https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1222804Westerman R.W. Whitehouse S.L. Hubble M.J.W. Timperley A.J. Howell J.R. Wilson M.J.

The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up: the first 540 cases.

Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B (9): 1002https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1535.R1Lie S.A. Engesaeter L.B. Havelin L.I. Gjessing H.K. Vollset S.E.

Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients.

Stat Med. 2004; 23: 3227-3240https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1905

Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8: 70https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-70Pakarinen O.A. Neuvonen P.S. Reito A.R.P. Eskelinen A.P.

Increased risk for dislocation after introduction of the Continuum cup system: lessons learnt from a cohort of 1,381 THRs after 1-year follow-up.

Acta Orthop. 2020; : 1-7https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2020.1744981da Assunção R.E. Pollard T.C.B. Hrycaiczuk A. Curry J. Glyn-Jones S. Taylor A.

Revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture using an uncemented modular tapered conical stem.

Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B (7): 1031https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.34431Fuchtmeier B. Galler M. Muller F.

Mid-Term Results of 121 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Increased Failure and Mortality Within but not After One Postoperative Year.

J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30: 669-674https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.006Lamb J.N. Jain S. King S.W. West R.M. Pandit H.G.

Risk Factors for Revision of Polished Taper-Slip Cemented Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Registry-Based Cohort Study from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of M.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102: 1600-1608https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01242Brodén C. Mukka S. Muren O. Eisler T. Boden H. Stark A. et al.

High risk of early periprosthetic fractures after primary hip arthroplasty in elderly patients using a cemented, tapered, polished stem.

Acta Orthop. 2015; 86: 169-174https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.971388Mohammed J. Mukka S. Hedbeck C.-J. Chammout G. Gordon M. Sköldenberg O.

Reduced periprosthetic fracture rate when changing from a tapered polished stem to an anatomical stem for cemented hip arthroplasty: an observational prospective cohort study with a follow-up of 2 years.

Acta Orthop. 2019; 90: 427-432https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1624339Hermansen L.L. Viberg B. Hansen L. Overgaard S.

“True” Cumulative Incidence of and Risk Factors for Hip Dislocation within 2 Years After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; (Publish Ah)https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01352Gundtoft P.H. Overgaard S. Schønheyder H.C. Møller J.K. Kjærsgaard-Andersen P. Pedersen A.B.

The “true” incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties: a prospective cohort study.

Acta Orthop. 2015; 86: 326-334https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1011983Abdel M.P. Watts C.D. Houdek M.T. Lewallen D.G. Berry D.J.

Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.

Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B (7): 461https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37201Pivec R. Issa K. Kapadia B.H. Cherian J.J. Maheshwari A.V. Bonutti P.M. et al.

Incidence and Future Projections of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of International Registry Data.

J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2015; 25: 269-275https://doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2015012625Windell L. Kulkarni A. Alabort E. Barba D. Reed R. Singh H.P.

Biomechanical Comparison of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Risk in the Exeter V40, CPT, and DePuy C-Stem in a Sawbone Model.

J Arthroplasty. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.061