Unused Samples from Clinical Blood Draws as a Resource for Maximizing Research Samples while Mitigating Iatrogenic Anemia Risks: A Pilot Study

Background Translational research driven by large-scale biological testing requires significant volumes of blood for research testing. However, blood is also required for clinical management of research subjects, which must take priority. Paradoxically, much of the blood drawn for clinical management goes unused. Here, we present our approach for retrieving unused blood samples collected for clinical management and recycling them for research purposes.

Methods Clinical Blood samples were collected for 60 days during a 61-day xenotransplantation experiment in a brain-dead decedent. Twice weekly, research staff went to the chemistry and hematology laboratories and collected stored blood, serum, and plasma samples that were >12 hours old. Sample collection and storage before retrieval was per standard clinical protocols. Samples were de-identified and relabeled and brought to a central biorepository for processing and storage. The quantity of plasma, serum, red blood cells (RBCs), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from clinical labs and bespoke research blood draws were compared.

Results Unused blood from clinical samples yielded a minimum of 6.0 ml per day of plasma, representing 62% of all plasma obtained. Serum was only recoverable on 13 days (22%), with a mean 2.3 ml collected on those days, representing 8% of all serum obtained. PBMCs were only recoverable on six days (10%).

Conclusions Overdrawn clinical laboratory samples represent an untapped resource of blood samples for research and can help augment samples collected explicitly for research purposes. With careful planning, this represents an opportunity to minimize iatrogenic blood loss in clinical-translational research.

Competing Interest Statement

Robert A. Montgomery has received research funds from Lung Biotechnology, a wholly owned subsidiary of United Therapeutics Corp. He serves on the advisory board of eGenesis and has been a strategic advisor for Recombinetics. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any direct funding. This study used resources from the NYU Langone Health Center for Biospecimen Research and Development (CBRD), Histology and Immunohistochemistry Laboratory (RRID:SCR_018304), supported in part by the Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center Support Grant (NIH/NCI P30CA016087). Ian S. Jaffe was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR001445. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Research on Decedents Oversight Committee of New York University gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Comments (0)

No login
gif