Biomechanical data play a crucial role in health research by providing relevant information about musculoskeletal mechanical loading and neuromuscular dysfunction during movement, which are essential for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. The relevance of such data for decision making processes in clinical settings depends on its quality and volume, as larger datasets enable more robust conclusions across diverse populations and conditions. In machine learning, extensive and representative datasets are vital for training algorithms to develop accurate predictive models. This systematic literature review explores the current landscape of biomechanical datasets and databases, examining existing resources, identifying gaps in data availability and quality, and discussing the potential for a new, structured database to address these shortcomings. We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer, and arXiv using keywords related to biomechanics, gait, and human activity recognition (HAR). The review identified studies covering various motion types, data formats, and metadata availability. Our findings highlight significant challenges, including inconsistent metadata, lack of standardization during data acquisition and data processing, limited motion variety, and accessibility issues. Addressing these challenges through standardized data formats, comprehensive metadata, and enhanced accessibility could greatly advance decision making processes via machine learning approaches for clinical and therapeutic settings. This review emphasizes the need for improved biomechanical data resources to support the development of accurate machine learning models and innovative clinical interventions.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript