Embodied Music Preference Modeling: Real-Time Prediction From Wearable Gait Telemetry, Google Fit Activity, and Gesture-Based Feedback

Abstract

Background Music is widely deployed to enhance exercise, yet far less is known about how an exerciser’s real-time physiological state feeds back to shape musical liking. Wearable sensors now permit second-by-second coupling of gait dynamics, activity load, and affective response.

Objective We developed a mobile workflow that predicts immediate like versus dislike judgments for unfamiliar songs by fusing clinical-grade inertial kinematics (Ambulosono), passive smartphone activity logs (Google Fit), and a single high-knees/low-knees gesture. The study tested whether momentary movement intensity biases preference, identified the strongest biometric predictors, and evaluated a sensor-aware classifier suitable for adaptive playlists.

Methods Seventy-three healthy undergraduates performed fifty 60-second stepping-in-place trials while listening to tempo-normalised tracks spanning five genres. Ambulosono units sampled lower-limb acceleration at 200 Hz; Google Fit recorded pre- and post-trial step counts. Four gait features—mean and peak cadence, mean and peak step length—were normalised and averaged into a Composite Motivation Score (CMS). Breathlessness and fatigue ratings were logged after each track. A 500-tree random forest trained on gait variables, activity counts, perceptual deltas, and CMS classified preference using 10-fold cross-validation. Statistical tests compared liked and disliked trials for physiological change and speed strata.

Results The protocol yielded 3 864 complete song exposures. Participants judged 54 % of tracks liked and 60 % disliked (paired t = –2.11, p = 0.036). Disliked trials exhibited larger breathlessness and fatigue increases (Wilcoxon p < 0.05). High-CMS trials showed a 68 % like-rate versus 37 % in low-CMS trials. The classifier achieved 0.78 accuracy and 0.82 AUC; permutation analysis ranked post-trial Google Fit steps, bout duration, and pre-trial steps as top predictors. Track-level analysis revealed that the ten most-disliked songs coincided with the highest mean stepping speeds, despite non-significant effects at coarse speed tiers.

Conclusions Immediate bodily engagement and short-term physiological strain strongly colour musical appraisal. Integrating wearable kinematics, smartphone step counts, and low-friction gestures enables accurate, interpretable prediction of liking, paving the way for context-adaptive playlists and emotionally intelligent rehabilitation cues.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was partly supported by Alberta Ministry of Mental Health.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with ethical standards approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (REB13-0009).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Comments (0)

No login
gif