Abstract Background: Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is associated with significant short- and long-term functional deficits, likely in consequence of rupture induced tendon elongation and associated changes in muscle contractile properties. Purpose: To investigate the association between tendon elongation and plantar flexor functional performance during unilateral hopping 12 months post-ATR. Further, the study examined side-to-side performance differences (injured vs. non-injured leg) 6 and 12 months post-ATR. Study Design: Explorative cross-sectional study. Methods: Participants (n=59) were recruited from the cohort of a larger randomized controlled trial. Tendon length was measured using ultrasonography at baseline and at 6 and 12 month post-ATR to determine tendon elongation. Heel-rise height deficit (injured minus non-injured side) and biomechanical variables of unilateral hopping (peak moment (Mpeak), peak concentric and eccentric power (CPpeak and EPpeak) and relative concentric and eccentric ankle joint work (RCWankle and REWankle)) were measured on both sides at 6 and 12 months post injury. Results: Absolute and relative 12 months post-ATR tendon elongation was 19.3% (CI: 15.8-22.8mm) and 11.2% (CI: 9.2-13.2%) respectively. No significant associations were found between tendon elongation and biomechanical variables or heel-rise height deficit. Although functional improvements were observed between 6 and 12 months, significant deficits in plantar flexor function during hopping persisted at 12 months post-ATR for the injured vs. non-injured leg. Specifically, Mpeak was 11% lower (p < 0.001), CPpeak and EPpeak were 36% (p < 0.001) and 28% lower (p = 0.001), respectively, and RCWankle and REWankle were 15% (p < 0.001) and 17% lower (p < 0.001), respectively, in the injured leg compared to the non-injured leg. Conclusion: No significant associations were shown between absolute Achilles tendon elongation and plantar flexor functional performance. Furthermore, side-to-side differences were shown to persist at 12 months. Level of Evidence: 3 Key Terms: Ankle joint function, biomechanics, elongation, hopping
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical TrialNCT03543943
Clinical Protocolshttps://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-020-04332-z
Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy at Copenhagen University Hospital Amager-Hvidovre. Further support has been given by DJO Global (100.000 euros), The Hospitals Research Foundation of Amager-Hvidovre Hospital (32.000 euros) and Fysioterapipraksisfonden (33.500 euros). This explorative study was independently initiated by the project group and funders did not have any role or authority concerning any part of the study.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
National Committee of Health Research Ethics (journal number: 1 10 72 428 17) gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data AvailabilityAll data produced in the present study are stored securely and are not available due to patient confidentiality and data protection regulations
Comments (0)