Small intestinal microbiota of undernourished women of reproductive age and microbiota-directed balanced energy protein (MD-BEP) supplementation in maternal environmental enteric dysfunction (EED): protocol for a community-based intervention study

Abstract

Introduction Studies show, malnourished women of childbearing age with environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) exhibit small intestinal enteropathy resembling that in malnourished children residing in the same community. However, currently there are no universally accepted protocols for validation of these facts. Our current protocol is designed to better understand the mechanism of transmission of the microbiota of mothers with EED to their children perpetuates intergenerational undernutrition. We plan to compare the small intestinal (SI) and fecal microbiota along with plasma, duodenal, and fecal proteomes/ metabolomes and histopathologic evidence of EED in non-pregnant women with and without malnutrition. We also plan to see and compare the effect of microbiota-directed balanced energy protein (MD-BEP) supplementation on these biological parameters between malnourished non-pregnant and pregnant women.

Methods and analysis This is a community-based intervention study where pregnant women and non-pregnant women of reproductive age (18-35 years) will be screened through household surveys from the Bauniabadh and adjacent slum area of Mirpur, Dhaka (pregnant and non-pregnant cohorts, n=90 each). Using Body Mass Index (BMI), both the groups will be categorized into undernourished (BMI <18.5kg/m2, n=60 each with pregnant and non-pregnant cohort) and well-nourished (BMI >20-24.9 kg/ m2, n=30, each with pregnant and non-pregnant cohort). Upper gastro-intestinal (UGI) endoscopy will be performed on non-pregnant women (both well-nourished and undernourished cohorts) and biopsy samples will be collected for diagnosis of environmental enteric dysfunction (EED) by histopathological scoring. We will compare the small intestinal (SI) and fecal microbiota and the plasma, duodenal, and fecal proteomes/ metabolomes of the undernourished non-pregnant cohort with histopathologic evidence of EED with the well-nourished non-pregnant cohort with no histopathologic evidence of EED (Aim IA). Furthermore, we will perform an intervention study (Aim IB). The undernourished non-pregnant cohort will be randomized into two groups (n=30/arm) and receive daily dietary supplementation with either shelf-stable microbiota-directed balanced energy protein (MD-BEP) or ready-to-use supplementary food balanced energy protein (RUSF-BEP) for 90 days. After cessation of the intervention they will be further followed up for another 270 days and biological samples will be collected at scheduled time points. The well-nourished non-pregnant cohort will not receive any nutritional intervention will serve as a reference control group. The undernourished pregnant cohort will also be randomly (n=30/arm) assigned to receive either MD-BEP or RUSF-BEP daily for 6 months until the child birth and thereafter for 3 months and followed up for another 9 months. During this period anthropometry will be measured and biological samples including fecal and plasma samples will be collected from the mothers and their infants in scheduled time points. Anthropometric, socio-demographic and laboratory assay data will be compared between the groups and candidate EED biomarkers will be correlated with nutritional status, histological analyses and score of EED, plus assessments of microbial community structure will be examined.

Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of icddr,b (protocol no: PR-22117; Version 1.2; 29 November 2022). Results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05862363. Registered on 08 February 2023. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05862363

Funding Statement

Yes

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical Review Committee of icddr,b approved the protocol (protocol no: PR-22117 Version 1.2 29 November 2022)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.

Comments (0)

No login
gif