Introduction/Objectives This study assesses the impact of natural disasters on the inequality of quality ANC utilization.
Methods This study uses data from the 2017-18 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey and monthly hazard reports from NIRAPAD. Inequalities in maternal healthcare utilization were measured using the Health Opportunity Index, and contributions of socioeconomic factors were decomposed using Shapley decomposition.
Results The results reveal that inequality in the utilization of quality antenatal care is significantly greater in disaster-affected areas (32.72; 95% CI: 16.07, 49.38) compared to disaster-unaffected areas (27.17; 95% CI: 15.95, 38.39). Furthermore, socioeconomic factors such as place of residence, administrative division, maternal employment status, and birth order contribute more to these inequalities in disaster-affected regions than in unaffected areas.
Conclusions The findings illustrate that natural disasters significantly increase the inequality in quality ANC utilization. Geographical location, employment status, and higher parity are key socio-economic factors contributing to the increasing inequality in quality ANC uptake. Therefore, Policymakers must prioritize equitable access to quality antenatal care by focusing on women of rural areas, those not engaged in formal employment, and individuals experiencing high-order pregnancies to mitigate these disaster-induced inequalities effectively.
Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
In this study secondary data are used which are available in the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program repository https://dhsprogram.com/data/. Therefore, author required no direct ethical approval for data collection. However, authors adhere to data use ethics of DHS program.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
8. Availability of dataThe datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program repository https://dhsprogram.com/data/. DHS data are publicly available upon request.
Comments (0)