Introduction Accurate tooth shade assessment is fundamental for achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes in restorative dentistry. This study aims to evaluate the impact of different lighting setups on the reliability and consistency of dental photography for shade selection.

Materials and Methods Three distinct lighting conditions were employed to capture standardized dental photographs: bare twin flash, twin flash with softbox, and twin flash with a polarizing filter. Shade assessments were performed through digital analysis of the photographs and were compared with reference measurements obtained using a spectrophotometer.

Result Preliminary findings indicate that the twin flash with a polarizing filter provides the most accurate tooth color reproduction. However, statistically significant differences were observed when compared to the spectrophotometer measurements. Notably, the closest match to the spectrophotometric values was achieved with light shades (A1, B1) photographed against a black background.

Conclusions The choice of lighting setup significantly affects the accuracy of tooth shade assessment in dental photography. Among the tested configurations, the use of a polarizing filter combined with a black background demonstrates the highest fidelity in color reproduction, particularly for lighter shades.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors