Adequate nutritional support is a cornerstone in the management of patients with acute neurological injuries admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Ensuring that these patients receive the appropriate nutrients is vital for their recovery, yet traditional methods of determining nutritional requirements—such as weight-based equations—are often inadequate. These approaches can result in overfeeding or, more commonly, underfeeding, particularly in neuro-ICU patients who tend to have prolonged hospital stays. Malnutrition in this vulnerable population is associated with a host of adverse outcomes, including increased susceptibility to infections, higher morbidity, longer ICU and hospital stays, and, ultimately, higher mortality rates.

The complex nature of neurological injuries adds to the difficulty in managing nutritional needs. Factors like the phase of stroke (acute or recovery), type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), intracranial pressure fluctuations, and overall neuronal activity can significantly affect a patient's metabolic rate.[1] Resting energy expenditure (REE) in such patients can vary widely, and this variability makes individualized nutritional support not only desirable but also essential. In response to this need, expert guidelines from organizations such as the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) have strongly recommended the use of indirect calorimetry (IC).[2] [3] [4] IC is considered the gold standard for determining energy requirements in critically ill patients, as it provides a more accurate and dynamic assessment of metabolic demands than predictive equations.[5] By using IC, clinicians can avoid the detrimental effects of both overfeeding, which can lead to metabolic complications such as hyperglycemia, and underfeeding, which can result in muscle wasting, immune suppression, and delayed recovery.[5]

In this issue of the Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Dube et al., present an important study that compares the impact of IC-guided enteral nutrition with standard weight-based formulae on ICU mortality and outcomes in ischemic stroke patients.[6] The study is particularly relevant as it addresses a critical gap in the literature regarding the role of IC in the neurocritical care setting. The findings are noteworthy: ischemic stroke patients who received IC-guided nutritional support had a lower incidence of organ failure compared with those whose nutritional intake was determined by a weight-based formula. However, the study also found that ICU length of stay, mortality, and neurological outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

Despite the important contributions of this study, it is crucial to acknowledge its limitations. As the authors have noted, the sample size was small, and no formal power analysis was conducted. These factors limit the generalizability of the results. Nonetheless, the meticulous design and implementation of this study provide valuable preliminary data that could serve as the foundation for future research. The study's rigorous methodology and focus on personalized care underscore its significance in advancing neurocritical care nutrition practices.

Article published online:
08 November 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India