Some statistical theory for interpreting reference distributions

Abstract

Reference distributions quantify the extremeness of clinical test results, typically relative to those of a healthy population. Intervals of these distributions are used in medical decision-making, but while there is much guidance for constructing them, the statistics of interpreting them for diagnosis have been less explored. Here we work directly in terms of the reference distribution, defining it as the likelihood in a posterior calculation of the probability of disease. We thereby identify assumptions of the conventional interpretation of reference distributions, criteria for combining tests, and considerations for personalizing interpretation of results from reference data. Theoretical reasoning supports that non-healthy variation be taken into account when possible, and that combining and personalizing tests call for careful statistical modeling.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

B.A.A. was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-2140743.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Comments (0)

No login
gif