Egan KB (2016) The epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: prevalence and incident rates. Urol Clin North Am 43:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.001
Liu H, Tian Y, Luo G et al (2021) Modified bladder outlet obstruction index for powerful efficacy prediction of transurethral resection of prostate with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMC Urol 21:170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00937-x
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ntia IO, Dikko AA (2002) The pattern of association of urethral stricture with benign prostatic hyperplasia in Nigerians. Sahel Med J 5:190–194. https://doi.org/10.4314/smj2.v5i4.12827
Chapman DW, Bekkema J, Rourke K (2021) Urinary symptom nonresponse (“LUTS Failure”) after urethroplasty: incidence and associations. J Urol 206:986–993. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001840
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) guideline—American urological association. https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/guidelines/benign-prostatic-hyperplasia-(bph)-guideline. Accessed 20 May 2024
Management of non-neurogenic male LUTS. In: Uroweb—European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts. Accessed 20 May 2024
Launer BM, McVary KT, Ricke WA, Lloyd GL (2021) The rising worldwide impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 127:722–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15286
Chung ASJ, McCammon KA (2017) Incidence and management of lower urinary tract symptoms after urethral stricture repair. Curr Urol Rep 18:70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0716-5
Horiguchi A, Shinchi M, Masunaga A et al (2018) Do transurethral treatments increase the complexity of urethral strictures? J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.100
Figueiredo FCA, Teloken PE (2022) Minimally invasive laser enucleation of the prostate (MiLEP): Slim (22Ch) and Ultra Slim (18.5Ch) HoLEP. Urol Video J 14:100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolvj.2022.100146
Baradaran N, Fergus KB, Moses RA et al (2019) Clinical significance of cystoscopic urethral stricture recurrence after anterior urethroplasty: a multi-institution analysis from Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS). World J Urol 37:2763–2768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02653-6
Dornbier RA, Kirshenbaum EJ, Nelson MH et al (2019) Socioeconomic and patient-related factors for the management of male urethral stricture disease. World J Urol 37:2523–2531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02702-0
Payne SR, Chalwe M (2022) Understanding the needs of low-income countries: how urologists can help. BJU Int 129:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15628
Patel A, Nunez R, Mmeje CO, Humphreys MR (2014) Safety and feasibility of concomitant surgery during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). World J Urol 32:1543–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1254-0
Garabed LR, Wang S, Meskawi M et al (2024) Complex buccal graft urethroplasty combined with holep in the setting of concomitant urethral stricture disease and severe benign prostatic hyperplasia: a case report. JU Open Plus 2:e00043. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU9.0000000000000139
Urethral strictures. In: Uroweb—European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urethral-strictures/chapter/classifications. Accessed 17 Sept 2024
Tobia IP, Gil SA, Nanni FD et al (2022) Simplified urethral score system for predicting complex anterior urethroplasty. Actas Urol Esp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.002
Warner JN, Malkawi I, Dhradkeh M et al (2015) A multi-institutional evaluation of the management and outcomes of long-segment urethral strictures. Urology 85:1483–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.041
Favre GA, Villa SG, Scherñuk J et al (2021) Glans preservation in surgical treatment of distal urethral strictures with dorsal buccal mucosa graft onlay by subcoronal approach. Urology 152:148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.014
Das AK, Teplitsky S, Humphreys MR (2019) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): a review and update. Can J Urol 26:13–19
Lee MS, Assmus MA, Ganesh M et al (2023) An outcomes comparison between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, open simple prostatectomy, and robotic simple prostatectomy for large gland benign prostatic hypertrophy. Urology 173:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.018
Di Maida F, Grosso AA, Tellini R et al (2023) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is safe and effective in patients with high comorbidity burden. Int Braz J Urol 49:341–350. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0174
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Al-Qudah HS, Santucci RA (2005) Extended complications of urethroplasty. Int Braz J Urol 31:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382005000400004
Krambeck A, Agarwal D, Lingeman J et al (2020) Temporary perineal urethrostomy during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Science Repository OU
Melchior J, Valk WL, Foret JD, Mebust WK (1974) Transurethral resection of the prostate via perineal urethrostomy: complete analysis of 7 years of experience. J Urol 111:640–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)60035-1
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bissada NK (1977) Transurethral resection of prostate via perineal urethrostomy: follow-up report. Urology 10:39–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(77)90036-x
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Porto JG, Blachman-Braun R, Delgado C et al (2023) Is holmium laser enucleation of the prostate truly size-independent? A critical evaluation at the extreme ends of the spectrum. Urology 182:204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.002
Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ et al (2021) Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART II-surgical evaluation and treatment. J Urol 206:818–826. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002184
Kim M, Piao S, Lee H-E et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for extremely large prostatic adenoma in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 56:218–226. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.3.218
Comments (0)