Background Distal radius fractures are extremely common. Patients routinely undergo early imaging (around 2 weeks) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures despite no clinical concerns. We analyzed the need for these radiographs by evaluating when imaging identifies complications after surgery.
Methods All distal radius fractures treated with ORIF via a volar approach by the senior surgeon were included. Intraoperative and postoperative images were analyzed for maintenance of reduction and complications. Demographic data, fracture characteristics, and postoperative complications were also recorded.
Results A total of 342 patients were identified. Postoperative images were obtained from 0 to 14, 15 to 90, 91 to 180, 181 to 365, or greater than 365 days after surgery. Some patients had multiple images. Measurements on postoperative images were statistically equivalent across all time points. Complications mostly occurred >90 days after surgery. Of the 26 patients with complications, 5 had a failure of reduction or plating seen on postoperative imaging. Two occurred after unrelated trauma; only three patients had unanticipated complications caught on routine imaging within 3 months after surgery. These patients had extraordinarily complex fractures in poor bone stock.
Conclusion Early postoperative imaging is not necessary after ORIF for distal radius fractures unless the patient is elderly, or the fracture is severely comminuted with ulnar column or die-punch components. Thus, we suggest that patients have imaging only in the 3- to 6-month period to determine if the union has been achieved, which could provide cost savings to both surgeon and patient.
Keywords distal radius - postoperative management - imaging DisclosuresAll authors have no commercial interests including products, devices, or drugs associated with this manuscript. There are no commercial associations that might pose or create a conflict of interest with information presented in this submitted manuscript such as consultancies, stock ownership, or patent-licensing arrangements. All sources of funds supporting this manuscript's completion are under the University of California Los Angeles' auspices.
All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
All patients were informed of possible participation in any experimental treatment in this study and agreed to participate.
Publication HistoryReceived: 28 March 2024
Accepted: 04 July 2024
Article published online:
12 September 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
Comments (0)