Cytogenetics of Aponogeton: an understudied and taxonomically intriguing genus

Alix K, Gérard PR, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS. Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Ann Bot. 2017;120(2):183–94.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Arends JC. Somatic chromosome numbers, In: van Bruggen HWE, editor. Monograph of the genus Aponogeton (Aponogetonaceae). Bibl Bot. 1985;33:9–10.

Castro S, Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Silveira P, Navarro L, Santos C. Evaluation of polysomaty and estimation of genome size in Polygala vayredae and P. calcarea using flow cytometry. Plant Sci. 2007;172(6):1131–7.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chougule RN, Surveswaran S, George A, Yadav SR, Lekhak MM. Roxburgh was right: Aponogeton microphyllus and Aponogeton undulatus are distinct species. J Biosci. 2023;48:53. 

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chougule RN, Yadav SR, Lekhak MM. Asexual propagation could be an escape to sustain the constraints of inefficient gametic system in the evolving endemic species: evidence from meiotic anomalies encountered in Aponogeton bruggenii (Aponogetonaceae). Nucleus. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-024-00469-3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chougule RN, Yadav SR, Lekhak MM. Leaf anatomical studies in Indian Aponogetonaceae. Phytomorphology. 2022;72:41–54.

Google Scholar 

Dahmer N, Schifino-Wittmann MT, Giuliani JC. Occurrence and significance of polysomaty in species of Mimosa L. Caryologia. 2012;65(3):208–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gaikwad SP. Studies on biology of some endemic aquatic monocots. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India (MS). 2000.

Gaikwad SP, Yadav SR, Gore RD, Garad KU. Karyomorphological studies of Aponogeton appendiculatus Bruggen and Aponogeton crispus Thunb. J Natn Sci Found Sri Lanka. 2014;42(2):163–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Knapp S. Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1991;96(3):985–9.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gargiulo GM, El Bakkouri B, Crisafulli A, Donato M, Picone R. Polysomaty and chromosome number variation in a population of Ceratophyllum demersum L. from Aquila Lake (Aspromonte Mountains, Calabria, Italy). Aquat Bot. 2022;180:103530.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hojsgaard D, Klatt S, Baier R, Carman JG, Hörandl E. Taxonomy and biogeography of apomixis in angiosperms and associated biodiversity characteristics. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2014;33(5):414–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jenczewski E, Alix K. From diploids to allopolyploids: the emergence of efficient pairing control genes in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2004;23(1):21–45.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Koduru PRK, Rao MK. Cytogenetics of synaptic mutants in higher plants. Theor Appl Genet. 1981;59(4):197–214.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 1964;52:201–20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mendes-Bonato AB, Pagliarini MS, Do Valle CB, Penteado MIDO. A severe case of chromosome stickness in pollen mother cells of Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst.) Stapf (Gramineae). Cytologia. 2001;66(3):287–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mishiba K, Mii M. Polysomaty analysis in diploid and tetraploid Portulaca grandiflora. Plant Sci. 2000;156(2):213–9.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Misra MP. Cytological studies in some Indian Potamogeton and Aponogeton species. Bull Bot Soc Bengal. 1972;26(1):47–51.

Google Scholar 

Peruzzi L, Eroğlu HE. Karyotype asymmetry: Again, how to measure and what to measure? Comp Cytogenet. 2013;7(1):1–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

POWO. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2024. Published on the internet; https://powo.science.kew.org/. Retrieved 20 June 2024

Rao PN, Ranganadham P, Nirmala A. Behaviour of a ‘sticky-desynaptic’ mutant in pearl millet. Genetica. 1990;81(3):221–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Raven PH. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: cytology. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1975;62(3):724–64.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sen S. Polysomaty and its significance in Liliales. Cytologia. 1973;38(4):737–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharma AK, Chatterjee T. Cytotaxonomy of Helobiae with special reference to the mode of evolution. Cytologia. 1967;32(2):286–307.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharma G, Sharma N. Cytology as an important tool for solving evolutionary problems in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci. 2014;84:1–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stebbins GL. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold; 1971.

Google Scholar 

Sybenga J. Chromosome pairing affinity and quadrivalent formation in polyploids: do segmental allopolyploids exist? Genome. 1996;39(6):1176–84.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

van Bruggen HWE. Aponogetonaceae. In: Kubitzki K, editor. The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 4. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1998. pp. 21–5.

Google Scholar 

van Bruggen HWE. Monograph of the genus Aponogeton (Aponogetonaceae). Bibl Bot. 1985;33:1–76.

Google Scholar 

Yadav SR. Die hybrid zwischen Aponogeton decaryi Jumelle and Aponogeton satarensis Raghavan, Kulkarni and Yadav. Aqua Planta. 1995;20(2):71–80.

Google Scholar 

Yadav SR, Dixit GB, Salunkhe CB. Cytological studies in Aponogeton satarensis Raghavan, Kulkarni and Yadav. Curr Sci. 1989;58(2):81–2.

Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif