Lagendijk JJ, Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJ, et al. MRI/linac integration. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86(1):25–9.
Winkel D, Bol GH, Kroon PS, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy: the elekta unity MR-linac concept. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019;18:54–9.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sonke JJ, Aznar M, Rasch C. Adaptive radiotherapy for anatomical changes. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):245–57.
Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, et al. IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM task group 119. Med Phys. 2009;36(11):5359–73.
Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: recommendations of AAPM task group no. 218. Med Phys. 2018;45(4):e53–83.
Raaijmakers AJ, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue-air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(7):1363–76.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nachbar M, Mönnich D, Boeke S, et al. Partial breast irradiation with the 1.5 T MR-linac: first patient treatment and analysis of electron return and stream effects. Radiother Oncol. 2020;145:30–5.
Chen GP, Ahunbay E, Li XA. Technical note: development and performance of a software tool for quality assurance of online replanning with a conventional Linac or MR-Linac. Med Phys. 2016;43(4):1713.
Graves SA, Snyder JE, Boczkowski A, et al. Commissioning and performance evaluation of RadCalc for the elekta unity MRI-linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(12):54–62.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li Y, Wang B, Ding S, et al. Feasibility of using a commercial collapsed cone dose engine for 1.5T MR-LINAC online independent dose verification. Phys Med. 2020;80:288–96.
Ahmad SB, Sarfehnia A, Paudel MR, et al. Evaluation of a commercial MRI Linac based monte carlo dose calculation algorithm with GEANT4. Med Phys. 2016;43(2):894–907.
Friedel M, Nachbar M, Mönnich D, Dohm O, Thorwarth D. Development and validation of a 1.5 T MR-linac full accelerator head and cryostat model for monte carlo dose simulations. Med Phys. 2019;46(11):5304–13.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li Y, Ding S, Wang B, Liu H, Huang X, Song T. Extension and validation of a GPU-monte carlo dose engine gDPM for 1.5 T MR-LINAC online independent dose verification. Med Phys. 2021;48(10):6174–83.
Cheng B, Xu Y, Li S, et al. Development and clinical application of a GPU-based monte carlo dose verification module and software for 1.5 T MR-LINAC. Med Phys. 2023;50(5):3172–83.
Interian Y, Rideout V, Kearney VP, et al. Deep nets vs expert designed features in medical physics: an IMRT QA case study. Med Phys. 2018;45(6):2672–80.
Tomori S, Kadoya N, Takayama Y, et al. A deep learning-based prediction model for gamma evaluation in patient-specific quality assurance. Med Phys. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13112.
Tomori S, Kadoya N, Kajikawa T, et al. Systematic method for a deep learning-based prediction model for gamma evaluation in patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Med Phys. 2021;48(3):1003–18.
Matsuura T, Kawahara D, Saito A, Yamada K, Ozawa S, Nagata Y. A synthesized gamma distribution-based patient-specific VMAT QA using a generative adversarial network. Med Phys. 2023;50(4):2488–98.
Hao Y, Zhang X, Wang J, Zhao T, Sun B. Improvement of IMRT QA prediction using imaging-based neural architecture search. Med Phys. 2022;49(8):5236–43.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Snyder JE, St-Aubin J, Yaddanapudi S, et al. Commissioning of a 1.5T elekta unity MR-linac: a single institution experience. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(7):160–72.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tozuka R, Kadoya N, Tomori S, et al. Improvement of deep learning prediction model in patient-specific QA for VMAT with MLC leaf position map and patient’s dose distribution. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24(10): e14055.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. 2014:arXiv:1409.1556. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014arXiv1409.1556S. Accessed 1 Sept 2014.
Quintero P, Benoit D, Cheng Y, Moore C, Beavis A. Machine learning-based predictions of gamma passing rates for virtual specific-plan verification based on modulation maps, monitor unit profiles, and composite dose images. Phys Med Biol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aca38a.
Reynolds M, Fallone BG, Rathee S. Dose response of selected solid state detectors in applied homogeneous transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields. Med Phys. 2014;41(9): 092103.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ellefson ST, Culberson WS, Bednarz BP, DeWerd LA, Bayouth JE. An analysis of the ArcCHECK-MR diode array’s performance for ViewRay quality assurance. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(4):161–71.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang Y, Pi Y, Ma K, et al. Virtual patient-specific quality assurance of IMRT Using UNet++: classification, gamma passing rates prediction, and dose difference prediction. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 700343.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nelms BE, Zhen H, Tomé WA. Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors. Med Phys. 2011;38(2):1037–44.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fredh A, Scherman JB, Fog LS, Munck af Rosenschöld P. Patient QA systems for rotational radiation therapy: a comparative experimental study with intentional errors. Med Phys. 2013;40(3):031716.
Tsekas G, Bol GH, Raaymakers BW, Kontaxis C. DeepDose: a robust deep learning-based dose engine for abdominal tumours in a 1.5 T MRI radiotherapy system. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(6):065017.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tsekas G, Bol GH, Raaymakers BW. Robust deep learning-based forward dose calculations for VMAT on the 1.5T MR-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67(22):225020.
Delfs B, Schoenfeld AA, Poppinga D, et al. Magnetic fields are causing small, but significant changes of the radiochromic EBT3 film response to 6 MV photons. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(3): 035028.
Steinmann A, O’Brien D, Stafford R, et al. Investigation of TLD and EBT3 performance under the presence of 1.5T, 0.35T, and 0T magnetic field strengths in MR/CT visible materials. Med Phys. 2019;46(7):3217–26.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
de Vries JHW, Seravalli E, Houweling AC, et al. Characterization of a prototype MR-compatible Delta4 QA system in a 1.5 tesla MR-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(2):02NT02.
Barten DLJ, Hoffmans D, Palacios MA, Heukelom S, van Battum LJ. Suitability of EBT3 GafChromic film for quality assurance in MR-guided radiotherapy at 0.35 T with and without real-time MR imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(16):165014.
Comments (0)