The Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a screening tool for sleep-related breathing disorders: An Umbrella Review

ABSTRACT

Purpose The purpose of this umbrella review was to assess available systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on the use of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a screening tool for identifying sleep related breathing disorders in children, with subsequent referral from dentists to physicians.

Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted with electronic databases to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a screening tool for pediatric sleep related breathing disorders. Eligible reviews were systematically selected and were assessed qualitatively with the AMSTAR 2 tool and quantitatively with meta-analyses methods.

Results A total of 129 articles for possible inclusion were identified, and five studies were selected for quantitative analysis. Of these five studies, the overall AMSTAR 2 quality assessment showed two with moderate and three with low quality ratings. The five studies showed point-estimate mean values for prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, positive predictive value, negative predictive value as, respectively, respectively, 50.58, 74.97, 49.68, 58.16, 62.24 percent, and the diagnostic odds ratio as 6.94 percent for the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire tool.

Conclusions Dentists should adhere to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry guidelines and know that there is low to moderate evidence to support the utilization of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire as a sufficiently accurate screening tool for the diagnosis of sleep related breathing disorders in children, followed by an appropriate referral to a physician for comprehensive assessment and management.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Hansjorg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Hospitals, New York, NY.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The IRB for the Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Hospitals waived ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Comments (0)

No login
gif