Background
Approximately two-thirds of patients transported to emergency departments (ED) for a fall are discharged from the ED without urgent treatment. This pilot study tests the feasibility of implementing a pre-hospital falls-assessment protocol performed by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to determine whether a patient who fell needs an ED assessment or could be referred safely to a community resource.
Methods
The protocol was administered by trained EMTs to adults aged ≥ 65 after a fall between October 2019 and March 2020 in Sherbrooke (QC). All patients were transported to ED regardless of protocol outcome (transport recommended/not recommended). The objective was to assess if EMTs could complete the protocol and make the appropriate decision concerning the transport to ED. Secondary objectives aimed to assess the accuracy in identifying patients who do not require transport, and to measure the impact on avoidable ambulance transports.
Results
A total of 125 EMTs interventions were carried out: 17 patients were in the transport not recommended group, representing 14% of transport to hospital for falls-related EMTs calls that could be possibly avoided. Of these, 110 were transported to ED. Mean duration of on-site EMTs interventions was of 31 minutes. Forty-seven patients were admitted, mostly for infections and fractures, including four in the transport not recommended group.
Conclusions
This study showed that EMTs can administer a falls-assessment protocol aimed at identifying patients that need an ED evaluation. Results permitted to amend the protocol before the second phase of the project evaluating the safety of the protocol.
DownloadsDownload data is not yet available.
How to Cite1.
Hutchinson P, Nadeau A, Mercier E, Bouchard J, Beaulieu S, Brousseau A-A, Breton Émilie. An Emergency Medical Technician Administered Falls-Assessment Protocol to Safely Identify Elderly Adults with Non-Urgent Conditions that may Avoid Transport to Emergency Department. Can Geriatr J [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 3 [cited 2024 Jun. 14];27(2):159-67. Available from: https://cgjonline.ca/index.php/cgj/article/view/732
Issue SectionOriginal Research
Comments (0)