Alvergne, A., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(3), 171–179.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bates, D. M. (2010). lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. In: Springer New York.

Bech-Sørensen, J., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: A replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(3), 171–176.

Article  Google Scholar 

Blake, K. R. (2022). When fertile, women seek status via prestige but not dominance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(46), e2205451119.

Article  Google Scholar 

Blake, K. R., Dixson, B. J., O’Dean, S. M., & Denson, T. F. (2016). Standardized protocols for characterizing women’s fertility: A data-driven approach. Hormones and Behavior, 81, 74–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bos, P. A., Jap-Tjong, N., Spencer, H., & Hofman, D. (2016). Social context modulates facial imitation of children’s emotional expressions. PLoS ONE, 11(12), e0167991.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107–136.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brase, G. L. (2006). Cues of parental investment as a factor in attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 145–157.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bressan, P. (2019). Confounds in “failed” replications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1884.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bressan, P., & Stranieri, D. (2008). The best men are (not always) already taken: Female preference for single versus attached males depends on conception risk. Psychological Science, 19(2), 145–151.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brown, M., Donahoe, S., & Boykin, K. (2022). Physical strength as a cue to men’s capability as protective parents. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 8(1), 81–88.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buckels, E. E., Beall, A. T., Hofer, M. K., Lin, E. Y., Zhou, Z., & Schaller, M. (2015). Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: Assessment, prediction, and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 497.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 147470490800600130.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cárdenas, R. A., Harris, L. J., & Becker, M. W. (2013). Sex differences in visual attention toward infant faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 280–287.

Article  Google Scholar 

Carré, J. M., McCormick, C. M., & Mondloch, C. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1194–1198.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chelnokova, O., Laeng, B., Eikemo, M., Riegels, J., Løseth, G., Maurud, H., & Leknes, S. (2014). Rewards of beauty: The opioid system mediates social motivation in humans. Molecular Psychiatry, 19(7), 746–747.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cobey, K. D., Havlíček, J., Klapilová, K., & Roberts, S. C. (2016). Hormonal contraceptive use during relationship formation and sexual desire during pregnancy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 2117–2122.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fiurašková, K., Roberts, S. C., Kaňková, Š, Hlaváčová, J., Calda, P., & Havlíček, J. (2022). Oral contraceptive use during relationship formation and current relationship satisfaction: Testing the congruency hypothesis in couples attending pregnancy and fertility clinics. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 135, 105451.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Welling, L. L., Gildersleeve, K., Pillsworth, E. G., Burriss, R. P., & Puts, D. A. (2016). How valid are assessments of conception probability in ovulatory cycle research? Evaluations, recommendations, and theoretical implications. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(2), 85–96.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17(2), 75–95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Garza, R., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2019). Fertility status in visual processing of men’s attractiveness. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(3), 328–342.

Article  Google Scholar 

Garza, R., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2023). The role of hormones in attraction and visual attention to facial masculinity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1067487.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Garza, R., Heredia, R. R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (2017). An eye tracking examination of men’s attractiveness by conceptive risk women. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917690741.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Garza, R., Pazhoohi, F., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2021). Women’s preferences for strong men under perceived harsh versus safe ecological conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, 19(3), 14747049211032352.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Geary, D. C. (2015). Evolution of paternal investment. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, 483–505.

Geary, D. C., Vigil, J., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Evolution of human mate choice. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 27–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gildersleeve, K., DeBruine, L., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2013). Shifts in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle: A critique of Harris (2011) and Harris (2012). Sex Roles, 69, 516–524.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Meta-analyses and p-curves support robust cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014).

Gouda-Vossos, A., Nakagawa, S., Dixson, B. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Mate choice copying in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4, 364–386.

Article  Google Scholar 

Guéguen, N. (2014). Cues of men’s parental investment and attractiveness for women: A field experiment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(3), 296–300.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harris, C. R. (2013). Shifts in masculinity preferences across the menstrual cycle: Still not there. Sex Roles, 69, 507–515.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hofer, M. K., Buckels, E. E., White, C. J., Beall, A. T., & Schaller, M. (2017). Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: An empirical distinction between protection and nurturance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550617728994.

Jonason, P. K., & Antoon, C. N. (2019). Mate preferences for educated partners: Similarities and differences in the sexes depend on mating context. Personality and Individual Differences, 148, 57–61.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Law Smith, M. J. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(1), 78–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim, A., Bradshaw, H., Durante, K. M., & Hill, S. E. (2018). Life history, fertility, and short-term mating motivation. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(3), 1474704918800062.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

Article  Google Scholar 

Lenth, R., & Lenth, M. R. (2018). Package ‘lsmeans.’ The American Statistician, 34(4), 216–221.

Google Scholar 

Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Petrie, M., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2013). Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(9), 1777–1785.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2010). Kind toward whom? Mate preferences for personality traits are target specific. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 29–38.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., & Li, N. P. (2019). Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Montoya, E. R., & Bos, P. A. (2017). How oral contraceptives impact social-emotional behavior and brain function. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21(2), 125–136.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moore, D., Wigby, S., English, S., Wong, S., Székely, T., & Harrison, F. (2013). Selflessness is sexy: Reported helping behaviour increases desirability of men and women as long-term sexual partners. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13(1), 1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399(6738), 741–742.

Article  PubMed